Mini Aceman vs Volvo EX30
Biggest differences: DC charging — Mini Aceman 95 kW, Volvo EX30 175 kW · Battery — Mini Aceman 49.2 kWh, Volvo EX30 69 kWh · 0–100 km/h — Mini Aceman 7.1 s, Volvo EX30 5.3 s.
Mini Aceman
The Mini Aceman is an electric crossover in the B-segment, offering three different drive configurations and battery capacities.
Volvo EX30
The Volvo EX30 is an all-electric SUV in the B segment, offering a wide range of powertrain configurations with varying ranges and performance levels.
Profile against the market: Mini Aceman vs Volvo EX30
Mini AcemanSE
Volvo EX30P5 Long Range
Mini Aceman or Volvo EX30 — who wins where
Volvo EX30 leads 8 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmVolvo EX30 +69 km
- Battery kWhVolvo EX30 +19.8 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmMini Aceman −2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSVolvo EX30 +54 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sVolvo EX30 −1.8 s
- Top speed km/hVolvo EX30 +10 km/h
- DC charging kWVolvo EX30 +80 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minVolvo EX30 −4 min
- Weight ↓ kgMini Aceman −65 kg
- Boot lVolvo EX30 +18 l
Technical data: Mini Aceman vs Volvo EX30
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Mini Aceman SE | Volvo EX30 P5 Long Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 406 km | 475 km | Volvo +69 km |
| Battery | 49.2 kWh | 69 kWh | Volvo +19.8 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15 kWh/100 km | 17 kWh/100 km | Mini −2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 95 kW | 175 kW | Volvo +80 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 31 min | 27 min | Volvo −4 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 9.2 km/min | 12.3 km/min | Volvo +3.1 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 218 PS | 272 PS | Volvo +54 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.1 s | 5.3 s | Volvo −1.8 s |
| Top speed | 170 km/h | 180 km/h | Volvo +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1710 kg | 1775 kg | Mini −65 kg |
| Boot | 300 l | 318 l | Volvo +18 l |
| Length | 4079 mm | 4233 mm | Volvo +154 mm |
| Width | 1754 mm | 1837 mm | Volvo +83 mm |
| Height | 1514 mm | 1549 mm | Volvo +35 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2606 mm | 2650 mm | Volvo +44 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Mini Aceman
Volvo EX30
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Mini Aceman
Volvo EX30
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment B
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Mini Aceman or Volvo EX30?
The Volvo EX30 goes further: 475 km WLTP against the 406 km of the Mini Aceman. That is a difference of 69 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Mini Aceman and the Volvo EX30 differ?
The Mini Aceman has FWD and 218 PS. The Volvo EX30 has RWD and 272 PS.
Which charges faster?
The Mini Aceman accepts up to 95 kW DC, the Volvo EX30 up to 175 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 31 and 27 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Mini Aceman uses less electricity: 15 kWh/100 km against 17 kWh/100 km in the Volvo EX30. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 300 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.