Mini Aceman vs Renault 4 E-Tech

Renault 4 E-Tech leads 5 to 4

Biggest differences: Power — Mini Aceman 218 PS, Renault 4 E-Tech 150 PS · Boot — Mini Aceman 300 l, Renault 4 E-Tech 420 l · 0–100 km/h — Mini Aceman 7.1 s, Renault 4 E-Tech 8.2 s.

Mini Aceman

The Mini Aceman is an electric crossover in the B-segment, offering three different drive configurations and battery capacities.

Renault 4 E-Tech

The Renault 4 E-Tech is an electric SUV in the B segment, offering two different powertrain options with varying battery capacities and power outputs.

Profile against the market: Mini Aceman vs Renault 4 E-Tech

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Mini Aceman or Renault 4 E-Tech — who wins where

Renault 4 E-Tech leads 5 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmRenault 4 E-Tech +3 km
    Mini Aceman
    406
    Renault 4 E-Tech
    409
  • Battery kWhRenault 4 E-Tech +2.8 kWh
    Mini Aceman
    49.2
    Renault 4 E-Tech
    52
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmMini Aceman −0.1 kWh/100 km
    Mini Aceman
    15
    Renault 4 E-Tech
    15.1
  • Power PSMini Aceman +68 PS
    Mini Aceman
    218
    Renault 4 E-Tech
    150
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sMini Aceman −1.1 s
    Mini Aceman
    7.1
    Renault 4 E-Tech
    8.2
  • Top speed km/hMini Aceman +20 km/h
    Mini Aceman
    170
    Renault 4 E-Tech
    150
  • DC charging kWRenault 4 E-Tech +5 kW
    Mini Aceman
    95
    Renault 4 E-Tech
    100
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Mini Aceman
    11
    Renault 4 E-Tech
    11
  • Weight ↓ kgRenault 4 E-Tech −181 kg
    Mini Aceman
    1710
    Renault 4 E-Tech
    1529
  • Boot lRenault 4 E-Tech +120 l
    Mini Aceman
    300
    Renault 4 E-Tech
    420

Add a third car

Technical data: Mini Aceman vs Renault 4 E-Tech

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Mini Aceman vs Renault 4 E-Tech
Key parameters Mini Aceman
SE
Renault 4 E-Tech
Comfort Range 150
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range406 km409 kmRenault +3 km
Battery49.2 kWh52 kWhRenault +2.8 kWh
Consumption ↓15 kWh/100 km15.1 kWh/100 kmMini −0.1 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging95 kW100 kWRenault +5 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging ⚠31 min 10–80%30 min 15–80%1 min
Range per minute of charging9.2 km/min8.9 km/minMini +0.3 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power218 PS150 PSMini +68 PS
0–100 km/h ↓7.1 s8.2 sMini −1.1 s
Top speed170 km/h150 km/hMini +20 km/h
DrivetrainFWDFWD—
Practicality
Weight ↓1710 kg1529 kgRenault −181 kg
Boot300 l420 lRenault +120 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Renault
Length4079 mm4140 mmRenault +61 mm
Width1754 mm1810 mmRenault +56 mm
Height1514 mm1570 mmRenault +56 mm
Wheelbase2606 mm2620 mmRenault +14 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Mini Aceman

Cost per 100 km4.5
Monthly56
Yearly675

Renault 4 E-Tech

Cost per 100 km4.53
Monthly57
Yearly679

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Mini Aceman

Renault 4 E-Tech

Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment B

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Renault 4 E-Tech — its 52 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Mini Aceman, with 49.2 kWh, does not offer it.

Which is more powerful — Mini Aceman or Renault 4 E-Tech?

The Mini Aceman is stronger: 218 PS against the 150 PS of the Renault 4 E-Tech. The gap is 68 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Renault 4 E-Tech takes more: 420 l against 300 l in the Mini Aceman. The difference is 120 l.

Which charges faster?

The Mini Aceman accepts up to 95 kW DC, the Renault 4 E-Tech up to 100 kW.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.