Alfa Romeo Junior vs Renault 4 E-Tech
Biggest differences: 0–100 km/h — Alfa Romeo Junior 9 s, Renault 4 E-Tech 8.2 s · Boot — Alfa Romeo Junior 400 l, Renault 4 E-Tech 420 l · Weight — Alfa Romeo Junior 1470 kg, Renault 4 E-Tech 1529 kg.
Alfa Romeo Junior
The Alfa Romeo Junior is a compact electric SUV that comes in two power variants, offering a range of up to 410 kilometers and a maximum power output of 280 horsepower.
Renault 4 E-Tech
The Renault 4 E-Tech is an electric SUV in the B segment, offering two different powertrain options with varying battery capacities and power outputs.
Profile against the market: Alfa Romeo Junior vs Renault 4 E-Tech
Alfa Romeo JuniorElettrica
Renault 4 E-TechComfort Range 150
Alfa Romeo Junior or Renault 4 E-Tech — who wins where
Alfa Romeo Junior leads 4 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAlfa Romeo Junior +1 km
- Battery kWhRenault 4 E-Tech +1 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAlfa Romeo Junior −0.1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAlfa Romeo Junior +6 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sRenault 4 E-Tech −0.8 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgAlfa Romeo Junior −59 kg
- Boot lRenault 4 E-Tech +20 l
Technical data: Alfa Romeo Junior vs Renault 4 E-Tech
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Alfa Romeo JuniorElettrica | Renault 4 E-TechComfort Range 150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 410 km | 409 km | Alfa Romeo +1 km |
| Battery | 51 kWh | 52 kWh | Renault +1 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15 kWh/100 km | 15.1 kWh/100 km | Alfa Romeo −0.1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 100 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 27 min 20–80% | 30 min 15–80% | 3 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 9.1 km/min | 8.9 km/min | Alfa Romeo +0.2 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 156 PS | 150 PS | Alfa Romeo +6 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 9 s | 8.2 s | Renault −0.8 s |
| Top speed | 150 km/h | 150 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1470 kg | 1529 kg | Alfa Romeo −59 kg |
| Boot | 400 l | 420 l | Renault +20 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Renault |
| Length | 4170 mm | 4140 mm | Alfa Romeo +30 mm |
| Width | 1780 mm | 1810 mm | Renault +30 mm |
| Height | 1500 mm | 1570 mm | Renault +70 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2557 mm | 2620 mm | Renault +63 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Alfa Romeo Junior
Renault 4 E-Tech
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Alfa Romeo Junior
Renault 4 E-Tech
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment B
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Why does the Renault 4 E-Tech have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Alfa Romeo Junior?
The Renault 4 E-Tech carries 52 kWh and covers 409 km, while the Alfa Romeo Junior with its 51 kWh battery does 410 km. Energy use decides it: 15.1 against 15 kWh/100 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Renault 4 E-Tech — its 52 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Alfa Romeo Junior, with 51 kWh, does not offer it.
Which charges faster?
The Alfa Romeo Junior accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Renault 4 E-Tech up to 100 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.


