Mini Aceman vs Peugeot e-2008
Biggest differences: Boot — Mini Aceman 300 l, Peugeot e-2008 434 l · Power — Mini Aceman 218 PS, Peugeot e-2008 156 PS · 0–100 km/h — Mini Aceman 7.1 s, Peugeot e-2008 9.1 s.
Mini Aceman
The Mini Aceman is an electric crossover in the B-segment, offering three different drive configurations and battery capacities.
Peugeot e-2008
An electric SUV in the B segment, offering a range of 406 kilometers and front-wheel drive.
Profile against the market: Mini Aceman vs Peugeot e-2008
Mini Aceman or Peugeot e-2008 — who wins where
It's a tie: 4 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmNo difference
- Battery kWhPeugeot e-2008 +4.8 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmMini Aceman −0.5 kWh/100 km
- Power PSMini Aceman +62 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sMini Aceman −2 s
- Top speed km/hMini Aceman +20 km/h
- DC charging kWPeugeot e-2008 +5 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgPeugeot e-2008 −162 kg
- Boot lPeugeot e-2008 +134 l
Technical data: Mini Aceman vs Peugeot e-2008
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters |  Mini AcemanSE |  Peugeot e-2008156 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 406 km | 406 km | No difference |
| Battery | 49.2 kWh | 54 kWh | Peugeot +4.8 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15 kWh/100 km | 15.5 kWh/100 km | Mini −0.5 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 95 kW | 100 kW | Peugeot +5 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 31 min 10–80% | 30 min 20–80% | 1 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 9.2 km/min | 8.1 km/min | Mini +1.1 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 218 PS | 156 PS | Mini +62 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.1 s | 9.1 s | Mini −2 s |
| Top speed | 170 km/h | 150 km/h | Mini +20 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1710 kg | 1548 kg | Peugeot −162 kg |
| Boot | 300 l | 434 l | Peugeot +134 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Peugeot |
| Length | 4079 mm | 4300 mm | Peugeot +221 mm |
| Width | 1754 mm | 1770 mm | Peugeot +16 mm |
| Height | 1514 mm | 1550 mm | Peugeot +36 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2606 mm | 2605 mm | Mini +1 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Mini Aceman
Peugeot e-2008
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Mini Aceman
Peugeot e-2008
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment B
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Peugeot e-2008 — its 54 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Mini Aceman, with 49.2 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Mini Aceman or Peugeot e-2008?
The Mini Aceman is stronger: 218 PS against the 156 PS of the Peugeot e-2008. The gap is 62 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Peugeot e-2008 takes more: 434 l against 300 l in the Mini Aceman. The difference is 134 l.
Which charges faster?
The Mini Aceman accepts up to 95 kW DC, the Peugeot e-2008 up to 100 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.