Peugeot e-2008 vs Renault 4 E-Tech

Renault 4 E-Tech leads 5 to 2

Biggest differences: 0–100 km/h — Peugeot e-2008 9.1 s, Renault 4 E-Tech 8.2 s · Power — Peugeot e-2008 156 PS, Renault 4 E-Tech 150 PS · Boot — Peugeot e-2008 434 l, Renault 4 E-Tech 420 l.

Peugeot e-2008

Peugeot e-2008 is a B-segment SUV with a 51 kWh battery, 156 hp and a WLTP range of 406 km.

Renault 4 E-Tech

The Renault 4 E-Tech is an electric SUV in the B segment, offering two different powertrain options with varying battery capacities and power outputs.

Profile against the market: Peugeot e-2008 vs Renault 4 E-Tech

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Peugeot e-2008 or Renault 4 E-Tech — who wins where

Renault 4 E-Tech leads 5 to 2

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmRenault 4 E-Tech +3 km
    Peugeot e-2008
    406
    Renault 4 E-Tech
    409
  • Battery kWhRenault 4 E-Tech +1 kWh
    Peugeot e-2008
    51
    Renault 4 E-Tech
    52
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmRenault 4 E-Tech −0.4 kWh/100 km
    Peugeot e-2008
    15.5
    Renault 4 E-Tech
    15.1
  • Power PSPeugeot e-2008 +6 PS
    Peugeot e-2008
    156
    Renault 4 E-Tech
    150
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sRenault 4 E-Tech −0.9 s
    Peugeot e-2008
    9.1
    Renault 4 E-Tech
    8.2
  • Top speed km/hNo difference
    Peugeot e-2008
    150
    Renault 4 E-Tech
    150
  • DC charging kWNo difference
    Peugeot e-2008
    100
    Renault 4 E-Tech
    100
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Peugeot e-2008
    11
    Renault 4 E-Tech
    11
  • Weight ↓ kgRenault 4 E-Tech −19 kg
    Peugeot e-2008
    1548
    Renault 4 E-Tech
    1529
  • Boot lPeugeot e-2008 +14 l
    Peugeot e-2008
    434
    Renault 4 E-Tech
    420

Add a third car

Technical data: Peugeot e-2008 vs Renault 4 E-Tech

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Peugeot e-2008 vs Renault 4 E-Tech
Key parameters Peugeot e-2008
156
Renault 4 E-Tech
Comfort Range 150
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range406 km409 kmRenault +3 km
Battery51 kWh52 kWhRenault +1 kWh
Consumption ↓15.5 kWh/100 km15.1 kWh/100 kmRenault −0.4 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging100 kW100 kWNo difference
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging ⚠30 min 20–80%30 min 15–80%No difference
Range per minute of charging8.1 km/min8.9 km/minRenault +0.8 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power156 PS150 PSPeugeot +6 PS
0–100 km/h ↓9.1 s8.2 sRenault −0.9 s
Top speed150 km/h150 km/hNo difference
DrivetrainFWDFWD—
Practicality
Weight ↓1548 kg1529 kgRenault −19 kg
Boot434 l420 lPeugeot +14 l
V2L (external power)YesYes—
Length4300 mm4140 mmPeugeot +160 mm
Width1770 mm1810 mmRenault +40 mm
Height1550 mm1570 mmRenault +20 mm
Wheelbase2605 mm2620 mmRenault +15 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Peugeot e-2008

Cost per 100 km4.65
Monthly58
Yearly697

Renault 4 E-Tech

Cost per 100 km4.53
Monthly57
Yearly679

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Peugeot e-2008

Renault 4 E-Tech

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment B

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which charges faster?

The Peugeot e-2008 accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Renault 4 E-Tech up to 100 kW.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Renault 4 E-Tech uses less electricity: 15.1 kWh/100 km against 15.5 kWh/100 km in the Peugeot e-2008. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 60 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.