Mercedes GLC vs Peugeot e-5008
Biggest differences: 0–100 km/h — Mercedes GLC 4.3 s, Peugeot e-5008 9.6 s · Power — Mercedes GLC 490 PS, Peugeot e-5008 231 PS · DC charging — Mercedes GLC 330 kW, Peugeot e-5008 160 kW.
Mercedes GLC
The Mercedes GLC is an all-electric SUV in the D segment, offering both rear-wheel drive and all-wheel drive options, as well as a long driving range.
Peugeot e-5008
The Peugeot e-5008 is an electric SUV in the D segment, offering three different powertrain configurations and battery capacities.
Profile against the market: Mercedes GLC vs Peugeot e-5008
Mercedes GLCGLC 400 4MATIC
Peugeot e-5008230 Long Range
Mercedes GLC or Peugeot e-5008 — who wins where
Mercedes GLC leads 7 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmMercedes GLC +51 km
- Battery kWhPeugeot e-5008 +2.9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmMercedes GLC −3.2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSMercedes GLC +259 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sMercedes GLC −5.3 s
- Top speed km/hMercedes GLC +40 km/h
- DC charging kWMercedes GLC +170 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgPeugeot e-5008 −219 kg
- Boot lMercedes GLC +222 l
Technical data: Mercedes GLC vs Peugeot e-5008
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Mercedes GLC GLC 400 4MATIC | Peugeot e-5008 230 Long Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 715 km | 664 km | Mercedes +51 km |
| Battery | 94 kWh | 96.9 kWh | Peugeot +2.9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 14.9 kWh/100 km | 18.1 kWh/100 km | Mercedes −3.2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 330 kW | 160 kW | Mercedes +170 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 22 min 10–80% | 27 min 20–80% | 5 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 22.7 km/min | 14.8 km/min | Mercedes +7.9 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 400 V | Mercedes +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 490 PS | 231 PS | Mercedes +259 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 4.3 s | 9.6 s | Mercedes −5.3 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 170 km/h | Mercedes +40 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2460 kg | 2241 kg | Peugeot −219 kg |
| Boot | 570 l | 348 l | Mercedes +222 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Peugeot |
| Length | 4845 mm | 4791 mm | Mercedes +54 mm |
| Width | 1913 mm | 1890 mm | Mercedes +23 mm |
| Height | 1644 mm | 1690 mm | Peugeot +46 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2972 mm | 2900 mm | Mercedes +72 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Mercedes GLC
Peugeot e-5008
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Mercedes GLC
Peugeot e-5008
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Mercedes GLC or Peugeot e-5008?
The Mercedes GLC goes further: 715 km WLTP against the 664 km of the Peugeot e-5008. That is a difference of 51 km.
Why does the Peugeot e-5008 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Mercedes GLC?
The Peugeot e-5008 carries 96.9 kWh and covers 664 km, while the Mercedes GLC with its 94 kWh battery does 715 km. Energy use decides it: 18.1 against 14.9 kWh/100 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Mercedes GLC and the Peugeot e-5008 differ?
The Mercedes GLC has AWD and 490 PS. The Peugeot e-5008 has FWD and 231 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Peugeot e-5008 — its 96.9 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Mercedes GLC, with 94 kWh, does not offer it.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.