Mercedes EQS vs Polestar 5

Biggest differences: Power — Mercedes EQS 408 PS, Polestar 5 748 PS · Boot — Mercedes EQS 610 l, Polestar 5 365 l · 0–100 km/h — Mercedes EQS 5.9 s, Polestar 5 3.9 s.

Mercedes EQS

The Mercedes EQS is an electric sedan in the F segment, offering a wide range of power configurations and a range of up to 926 km according to the WLTP cycle.

Polestar 5

An electric sedan in the F-segment class, offering high-powered engines and fast DC charging capabilities.

Profile against the market: Mercedes EQS vs Polestar 5

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Mercedes EQS or Polestar 5 — who wins where

Mercedes EQS leads 5 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmMercedes EQS +248 km
    Mercedes EQS
    926
    Polestar 5
    678
  • Battery kWhMercedes EQS +10 kWh
    Mercedes EQS
    122
    Polestar 5
    112
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmMercedes EQS −3.4 kWh/100 km
    Mercedes EQS
    15.4
    Polestar 5
    18.8
  • Power PSPolestar 5 +340 PS
    Mercedes EQS
    408
    Polestar 5
    748
  • 0–100 km/h sPolestar 5 −2 s
    Mercedes EQS
    5.9
    Polestar 5
    3.9
  • Top speed km/hPolestar 5 +40 km/h
    Mercedes EQS
    210
    Polestar 5
    250
  • DC charging kWNo difference
    Mercedes EQS
    350
    Polestar 5
    350
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Mercedes EQS
    11
    Polestar 5
    11
  • Charging minPolestar 5 −5 min
    Mercedes EQS
    27
    Polestar 5
    22
  • Weight kgMercedes EQS −25 kg
    Mercedes EQS
    2475
    Polestar 5
    2500
  • Boot lMercedes EQS +245 l
    Mercedes EQS
    610
    Polestar 5
    365

Add a third car

Technical data: Mercedes EQS vs Polestar 5

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Mercedes EQS vs Polestar 5
Key parameters Mercedes EQS
EQS 450+
Polestar 5
Dual Motor
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range926 km678 kmMercedes +248 km
Battery122 kWh112 kWhMercedes +10 kWh
Consumption15.4 kWh/100 km18.8 kWh/100 kmMercedes −3.4 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging350 kW350 kWNo difference
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%27 min22 minPolestar −5 min
Range per minute of charging24 km/min21.6 km/minMercedes +2.4 km/min
Voltage800 V800 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power408 PS748 PSPolestar +340 PS
0–100 km/h5.9 s3.9 sPolestar −2 s
Top speed210 km/h250 km/hPolestar +40 km/h
DrivetrainRWDAWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight2475 kg2500 kgMercedes −25 kg
Boot610 l365 lMercedes +245 l
Length5225 mm5087 mmMercedes +138 mm
Width1926 mm1960 mmPolestar +34 mm
Height1510 mm1449 mmMercedes +61 mm
Wheelbase3210 mm3080 mmMercedes +130 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Mercedes EQS

Cost per 100 km4.62
Monthly58
Yearly693

Polestar 5

Cost per 100 km5.64
Monthly71
Yearly846

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Mercedes EQS

Polestar 5

Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment F

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Mercedes EQS or Polestar 5?

The Mercedes EQS goes further: 926 km WLTP against the 678 km of the Polestar 5. That is a difference of 248 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Mercedes EQS and the Polestar 5 differ?

The Mercedes EQS has RWD and 408 PS. The Polestar 5 has AWD and 748 PS.

Which is more powerful — Mercedes EQS or Polestar 5?

The Polestar 5 is stronger: 748 PS against the 408 PS of the Mercedes EQS. The gap is 340 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Mercedes EQS takes more: 610 l against 365 l in the Polestar 5. The difference is 245 l.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.