Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé vs Mercedes EQS
Biggest differences: Charging 10–80% — Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé 16 min, Mercedes EQS 27 min · 0–100 km/h — Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé 3.9 s, Mercedes EQS 5.9 s · Boot — Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé 415 l, Mercedes EQS 610 l.
Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé
The Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé is a luxury sedan in the F segment offering three powertrain variants with power ranging from 367 horsepower to 721 horsepower.
Mercedes EQS
The Mercedes EQS is an electric sedan in the F segment, offering a wide range of power configurations and a range of up to 926 km according to the WLTP cycle.
Profile against the market: Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé vs Mercedes EQS
Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door CoupéGT 53 4MATIC+- Mercedes EQSEQS 450+
Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé or Mercedes EQS — who wins where
Mercedes EQS leads 5 to 4
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmMercedes EQS +117 km
- Battery kWhMercedes EQS +16 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmMercedes EQS −0.2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSMercedes EQS +41 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sMercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé −2 s
- Top speed km/hMercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé +20 km/h
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWNo data
- Charging ↓ minMercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé −11 min
- Weight ↓ kgMercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé −100 kg
- Boot lMercedes EQS +195 l
Technical data: Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé vs Mercedes EQS
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé GT 53 4MATIC+ | Mercedes EQS EQS 450+ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 809 km | 926 km | Mercedes +117 km |
| Battery | 106 kWh | 122 kWh | Mercedes +16 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.6 kWh/100 km | 15.4 kWh/100 km | Mercedes −0.2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 350 kW | 350 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | — | 11 kW | — |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 16 min | 27 min | Mercedes −11 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 35.4 km/min | 24 km/min | Mercedes +11.4 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 800 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 367 PS | 408 PS | Mercedes +41 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 3.9 s | 5.9 s | Mercedes −2 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h | 210 km/h | Mercedes +20 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2375 kg | 2475 kg | Mercedes −100 kg |
| Boot | 415 l | 610 l | Mercedes +195 l |
| Length | 5094 mm | 5225 mm | Mercedes +131 mm |
| Width | 1959 mm | 1926 mm | Mercedes +33 mm |
| Height | 1411 mm | 1510 mm | Mercedes +99 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3040 mm | 3210 mm | Mercedes +170 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé
Mercedes EQS
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Mercedes EQS
Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment F
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé or Mercedes EQS?
The Mercedes EQS goes further: 926 km WLTP against the 809 km of the Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé. That is a difference of 117 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé and the Mercedes EQS differ?
The Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé has AWD and 367 PS. The Mercedes EQS has RWD and 408 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Mercedes EQS takes more: 610 l against 415 l in the Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé. The difference is 195 l.
Which charges faster?
The Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé accepts up to 350 kW DC, the Mercedes EQS up to 350 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 16 and 27 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.