Mercedes EQE SUV vs Volvo EX90
Biggest differences: DC charging — Mercedes EQE SUV 170 kW, Volvo EX90 350 kW · Boot — Mercedes EQE SUV 520 l, Volvo EX90 324 l · Charging 10–80% — Mercedes EQE SUV 32 min, Volvo EX90 22 min.
Mercedes EQE SUV
The Mercedes EQE SUV is an all-electric SUV in the E segment, offering three different drive configurations and battery capacities.
Volvo EX90
The Volvo EX90 is an all-electric SUV in the E segment, offering three powertrain options with power ranging from 333 horsepower to 680 horsepower.
Profile against the market: Mercedes EQE SUV vs Volvo EX90
Mercedes EQE SUVEQE 500 4MATIC
Volvo EX90Twin Motor
Mercedes EQE SUV or Volvo EX90 — who wins where
It's a tie: 5 to 5
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmVolvo EX90 +28 km
- Battery kWhVolvo EX90 +10 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmMercedes EQE SUV −0.1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSVolvo EX90 +7 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sMercedes EQE SUV −0.8 s
- Top speed km/hMercedes EQE SUV +30 km/h
- DC charging kWVolvo EX90 +180 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minVolvo EX90 −10 min
- Weight ↓ kgMercedes EQE SUV −75 kg
- Boot lMercedes EQE SUV +196 l
Technical data: Mercedes EQE SUV vs Volvo EX90
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Mercedes EQE SUV EQE 500 4MATIC | Volvo EX90 Twin Motor | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 597 km | 625 km | Volvo +28 km |
| Battery | 96 kWh | 106 kWh | Volvo +10 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 19.3 kWh/100 km | 19.4 kWh/100 km | Mercedes −0.1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 170 kW | 350 kW | Volvo +180 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 32 min | 22 min | Volvo −10 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 13.1 km/min | 19.9 km/min | Volvo +6.8 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 800 V | Volvo +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 449 PS | 456 PS | Volvo +7 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 4.7 s | 5.5 s | Mercedes −0.8 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 180 km/h | Mercedes +30 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2615 kg | 2690 kg | Mercedes −75 kg |
| Boot | 520 l | 324 l | Mercedes +196 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Volvo |
| Length | 4863 mm | 5037 mm | Volvo +174 mm |
| Width | 1940 mm | 1964 mm | Volvo +24 mm |
| Height | 1707 mm | 1744 mm | Volvo +37 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3030 mm | 2985 mm | Mercedes +45 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Mercedes EQE SUV
Volvo EX90
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Mercedes EQE SUV
Volvo EX90
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment E
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Mercedes EQE SUV or Volvo EX90?
The Volvo EX90 goes further: 625 km WLTP against the 597 km of the Mercedes EQE SUV. That is a difference of 28 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Volvo EX90 — its 106 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Mercedes EQE SUV, with 96 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Mercedes EQE SUV takes more: 520 l against 324 l in the Volvo EX90. The difference is 196 l.
Which charges faster?
The Mercedes EQE SUV accepts up to 170 kW DC, the Volvo EX90 up to 350 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 32 and 22 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.