Mercedes C EQ vs Nio ET5

Biggest differences: DC charging — Mercedes C EQ 330 kW, Nio ET5 125 kW · Charging 10–80% — Mercedes C EQ 22 min, Nio ET5 40 min · Consumption — Mercedes C EQ 14.3 kWh/100 km, Nio ET5 18.6 kWh/100 km.

Mercedes C EQ

An electric sedan in the D class, offering high performance with all-wheel drive and fast (DC) charging.

Nio ET5

The Nio ET5 is a sedan in the D-segment, offering all-wheel drive and acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in 4 seconds.

Profile against the market: Mercedes C EQ vs Nio ET5

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Mercedes C EQ or Nio ET5 — who wins where

Mercedes C EQ leads 6 to 2

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmMercedes C EQ +172 km
    Mercedes C EQ
    762
    Nio ET5
    590
  • Battery kWhNio ET5 +6 kWh
    Mercedes C EQ
    94
    Nio ET5
    100
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmMercedes C EQ −4.3 kWh/100 km
    Mercedes C EQ
    14.3
    Nio ET5
    18.6
  • Power PSNo difference
    Mercedes C EQ
    489
    Nio ET5
    489
  • 0–100 km/h sNo difference
    Mercedes C EQ
    4
    Nio ET5
    4
  • Top speed km/hMercedes C EQ +10 km/h
    Mercedes C EQ
    210
    Nio ET5
    200
  • DC charging kWMercedes C EQ +205 kW
    Mercedes C EQ
    330
    Nio ET5
    125
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Mercedes C EQ
    11
    Nio ET5
    11
  • Charging minMercedes C EQ −18 min
    Mercedes C EQ
    22
    Nio ET5
    40
  • Weight kgNio ET5 −225 kg
    Mercedes C EQ
    2385
    Nio ET5
    2160
  • Boot lMercedes C EQ +84 l
    Mercedes C EQ
    470
    Nio ET5
    386

Add a third car

Technical data: Mercedes C EQ vs Nio ET5

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Mercedes C EQ vs Nio ET5
Key parameters Mercedes C EQ
C 400 4MATIC
Nio ET5
100 kWh
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range762 km590 kmMercedes +172 km
Battery94 kWh100 kWhNio +6 kWh
Consumption14.3 kWh/100 km18.6 kWh/100 kmMercedes −4.3 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging330 kW125 kWMercedes +205 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%22 min40 minMercedes −18 min
Range per minute of charging24.2 km/min10.3 km/minMercedes +13.9 km/min
Voltage800 V400 VMercedes +400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power489 PS489 PSNo difference
0–100 km/h4 s4 sNo difference
Top speed210 km/h200 km/hMercedes +10 km/h
DrivetrainAWDAWD
Practicality
Weight2385 kg2160 kgNio −225 kg
Boot470 l386 lMercedes +84 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Nio
Length4883 mm4790 mmMercedes +93 mm
Width1892 mm1960 mmNio +68 mm
Height1503 mm1499 mmMercedes +4 mm
Wheelbase2962 mm2888 mmMercedes +74 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Mercedes C EQ

Cost per 100 km4.29
Monthly54
Yearly644

Nio ET5

Cost per 100 km5.58
Monthly70
Yearly837

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Mercedes C EQ

Nio ET5

Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Mercedes C EQ or Nio ET5?

The Mercedes C EQ goes further: 762 km WLTP against the 590 km of the Nio ET5. That is a difference of 172 km.

Why does the Nio ET5 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Mercedes C EQ?

The Nio ET5 carries 100 kWh and covers 590 km, while the Mercedes C EQ with its 94 kWh battery does 762 km. Energy use decides it: 18.6 against 14.3 kWh/100 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Nio ET5 — its 100 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Mercedes C EQ, with 94 kWh, does not offer it.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Mercedes C EQ takes more: 470 l against 386 l in the Nio ET5. The difference is 84 l.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.