Mazda CX-6e vs SERES 5
SERES 5 leads 6 to 2
Biggest differences: DC charging — Mazda CX-6e 195 kW, SERES 5 100 kW · Power — Mazda CX-6e 258 PS, SERES 5 490 PS · 0–100 km/h — Mazda CX-6e 7.9 s, SERES 5 4.5 s.
Mazda CX-6e
The Mazda CX-6e is a D-segment SUV with rear-wheel drive, offering a range of 484 km in the WLTP cycle and fast DC charging capabilities.
SERES 5
The SERES 5 is a D-segment SUV with all-wheel drive (AWD) and a WLTP range of up to 480 kilometers, offering a power output of 490 horsepower.
Profile against the market: Mazda CX-6e vs SERES 5
Mazda CX-6eTakumi
SERES 5Long Range AWD
Mazda CX-6e or SERES 5 — who wins where
SERES 5 leads 6 to 2
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmMazda CX-6e +4 km
- Battery kWhSERES 5 +2 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmSERES 5 −2.8 kWh/100 km
- Power PSSERES 5 +232 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sSERES 5 −3.4 s
- Top speed km/hSERES 5 +15 km/h
- DC charging kWMazda CX-6e +95 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgNo data
- Boot lSERES 5 +87 l
Technical data: Mazda CX-6e vs SERES 5
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Mazda CX-6e Takumi | SERES 5 Long Range AWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 484 km | 480 km | Mazda +4 km |
| Battery | 78 kWh | 80 kWh | SERES +2 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 18.9 kWh/100 km | 16.1 kWh/100 km | SERES −2.8 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 195 kW | 100 kW | Mazda +95 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 24 min | — | — |
| Range per minute of charging | 14.1 km/min | — | — |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 258 PS | 490 PS | SERES +232 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.9 s | 4.5 s | SERES −3.4 s |
| Top speed | 185 km/h | 200 km/h | SERES +15 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2130 kg | — | — |
| Boot | 363 l | 450 l | SERES +87 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4850 mm | 4700 mm | Mazda +150 mm |
| Width | 1935 mm | 1930 mm | Mazda +5 mm |
| Height | 1620 mm | 1625 mm | SERES +5 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2902 mm | 2880 mm | Mazda +22 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Mazda CX-6e
SERES 5
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Mazda CX-6e
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Why does the SERES 5 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Mazda CX-6e?
The SERES 5 carries 80 kWh and covers 480 km, while the Mazda CX-6e with its 78 kWh battery does 484 km. Energy use decides it: 16.1 against 18.9 kWh/100 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Mazda CX-6e and the SERES 5 differ?
The Mazda CX-6e has RWD and 258 PS. The SERES 5 has AWD and 490 PS.
Which is more powerful — Mazda CX-6e or SERES 5?
The SERES 5 is stronger: 490 PS against the 258 PS of the Mazda CX-6e. The gap is 232 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The SERES 5 takes more: 450 l against 363 l in the Mazda CX-6e. The difference is 87 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.