BYD Sealion 7 vs SERES 5

BYD Sealion 7 leads 6 to 1

Biggest differences: DC charging — BYD Sealion 7 230 kW, SERES 5 100 kW · Boot — BYD Sealion 7 520 l, SERES 5 450 l · Battery — BYD Sealion 7 91.3 kWh, SERES 5 80 kWh.

BYD Sealion 7

BYD Sealion 7 is a D-segment SUV in three variants: WLTP range from 456 to 502 km, power from 312 to 530 hp.

SERES 5

The SERES 5 is a D-segment SUV with all-wheel drive (AWD) and a WLTP range of up to 480 kilometers, offering a power output of 490 horsepower.

Profile against the market: BYD Sealion 7 vs SERES 5

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BYD Sealion 7 or SERES 5 — who wins where

BYD Sealion 7 leads 6 to 1

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmBYD Sealion 7 +22 km
    BYD Sealion 7
    502
    SERES 5
    480
  • Battery kWhBYD Sealion 7 +11.3 kWh
    BYD Sealion 7
    91.3
    SERES 5
    80
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmSERES 5 −2.1 kWh/100 km
    BYD Sealion 7
    18.2
    SERES 5
    16.1
  • Power PSBYD Sealion 7 +40 PS
    BYD Sealion 7
    530
    SERES 5
    490
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sNo difference
    BYD Sealion 7
    4.5
    SERES 5
    4.5
  • Top speed km/hBYD Sealion 7 +15 km/h
    BYD Sealion 7
    215
    SERES 5
    200
  • DC charging kWBYD Sealion 7 +130 kW
    BYD Sealion 7
    230
    SERES 5
    100
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    BYD Sealion 7
    11
    SERES 5
    11
  • Charging ↓ minNo data
    BYD Sealion 7
    24
    SERES 5
    —
  • Weight ↓ kgNo data
    BYD Sealion 7
    2435
    SERES 5
    —
  • Boot lBYD Sealion 7 +70 l
    BYD Sealion 7
    520
    SERES 5
    450

Add a third car

Technical data: BYD Sealion 7 vs SERES 5

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BYD Sealion 7 vs SERES 5
Key parameters BYD Sealion 7
Excellence AWD
SERES 5
Long Range AWD
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range502 km480 kmBYD +22 km
Battery91.3 kWh80 kWhBYD +11.3 kWh
Consumption ↓18.2 kWh/100 km16.1 kWh/100 kmSERES −2.1 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging230 kW100 kWBYD +130 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80% ↓24 min——
Range per minute of charging14.6 km/min——
Voltage—400 V—
Performance and drivetrain
Power530 PS490 PSBYD +40 PS
0–100 km/h ↓4.5 s4.5 sNo difference
Top speed215 km/h200 km/hBYD +15 km/h
DrivetrainAWDAWD—
Practicality
Weight ↓2435 kg——
Boot520 l450 lBYD +70 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly SERES
Length4830 mm4700 mmBYD +130 mm
Width—1930 mm—
Height—1625 mm—
Wheelbase2930 mm2880 mmBYD +50 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BYD Sealion 7

Cost per 100 km5.46
Monthly68
Yearly819

SERES 5

Cost per 100 km4.83
Monthly60
Yearly725

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BYD Sealion 7

SERES 5

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — BYD Sealion 7 or SERES 5?

The BYD Sealion 7 goes further: 502 km WLTP against the 480 km of the SERES 5. That is a difference of 22 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the SERES 5 — its 80 kWh battery then works as a power source. The BYD Sealion 7, with 91.3 kWh, does not offer it.

Which has the bigger boot?

The BYD Sealion 7 takes more: 520 l against 450 l in the SERES 5. The difference is 70 l.

Which charges faster?

The BYD Sealion 7 accepts up to 230 kW DC, the SERES 5 up to 100 kW.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.