BYD Sealion 7 vs SERES 5

Biggest differences: Power — BYD Sealion 7 312 PS, SERES 5 490 PS · DC charging — BYD Sealion 7 150 kW, SERES 5 100 kW · 0–100 km/h — BYD Sealion 7 6.7 s, SERES 5 4.5 s.

BYD Sealion 7

This electric SUV, belonging to the D-segment, offers two powertrain options with power ranging from 312 horsepower to 530 horsepower.

SERES 5

The SERES 5 is a D-segment SUV with all-wheel drive (AWD) and a WLTP range of up to 480 kilometers, offering a power output of 490 horsepower.

Profile against the market: BYD Sealion 7 vs SERES 5

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BYD Sealion 7 or SERES 5 — who wins where

BYD Sealion 7 leads 5 to 3

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmBYD Sealion 7 +2 km
    BYD Sealion 7
    482
    SERES 5
    480
  • Battery kWhBYD Sealion 7 +2.5 kWh
    BYD Sealion 7
    82.5
    SERES 5
    80
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmSERES 5 −3.8 kWh/100 km
    BYD Sealion 7
    19.9
    SERES 5
    16.1
  • Power PSSERES 5 +178 PS
    BYD Sealion 7
    312
    SERES 5
    490
  • 0–100 km/h sSERES 5 −2.2 s
    BYD Sealion 7
    6.7
    SERES 5
    4.5
  • Top speed km/hBYD Sealion 7 +15 km/h
    BYD Sealion 7
    215
    SERES 5
    200
  • DC charging kWBYD Sealion 7 +50 kW
    BYD Sealion 7
    150
    SERES 5
    100
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    BYD Sealion 7
    11
    SERES 5
    11
  • Charging minNo data
    BYD Sealion 7
    32
    SERES 5
  • Weight kgNo data
    BYD Sealion 7
    2225
    SERES 5
  • Boot lBYD Sealion 7 +70 l
    BYD Sealion 7
    520
    SERES 5
    450

Add a third car

Technical data: BYD Sealion 7 vs SERES 5

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BYD Sealion 7 vs SERES 5
Key parameters BYD Sealion 7
Comfort RWD
SERES 5
Long Range AWD
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range482 km480 kmBYD +2 km
Battery82.5 kWh80 kWhBYD +2.5 kWh
Consumption19.9 kWh/100 km16.1 kWh/100 kmSERES −3.8 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging150 kW100 kWBYD +50 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%32 min
Range per minute of charging10.5 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power312 PS490 PSSERES +178 PS
0–100 km/h6.7 s4.5 sSERES −2.2 s
Top speed215 km/h200 km/hBYD +15 km/h
DrivetrainRWDAWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight2225 kg
Boot520 l450 lBYD +70 l
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length4830 mm4700 mmBYD +130 mm
Width1925 mm1930 mmSERES +5 mm
Height1620 mm1625 mmSERES +5 mm
Wheelbase2930 mm2880 mmBYD +50 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BYD Sealion 7

Cost per 100 km5.97
Monthly75
Yearly896

SERES 5

Cost per 100 km4.83
Monthly60
Yearly725

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BYD Sealion 7

SERES 5

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

How do the drivetrains of the BYD Sealion 7 and the SERES 5 differ?

The BYD Sealion 7 has RWD and 312 PS. The SERES 5 has AWD and 490 PS.

Which is more powerful — BYD Sealion 7 or SERES 5?

The SERES 5 is stronger: 490 PS against the 312 PS of the BYD Sealion 7. The gap is 178 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The BYD Sealion 7 takes more: 520 l against 450 l in the SERES 5. The difference is 70 l.

Which charges faster?

The BYD Sealion 7 accepts up to 150 kW DC, the SERES 5 up to 100 kW.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.