Maxus MIFA 7 vs Toyota Proace Verso
Biggest differences: Power — Maxus MIFA 7 245 PS, Toyota Proace Verso 136 PS · WLTP range — Maxus MIFA 7 480 km, Toyota Proace Verso 337 km · Top speed — Maxus MIFA 7 180 km/h, Toyota Proace Verso 130 km/h.
Maxus MIFA 7
An electric van in the D-segment, offering two battery capacity options with a shared motor power output.
Toyota Proace Verso
The Toyota Proace Verso is an electric van in the D-segment, offering a WLTP range of 337 km and the ability to fast charge with direct current.
Profile against the market: Maxus MIFA 7 vs Toyota Proace Verso
Maxus MIFA 790 kWh
Toyota Proace VersoLong 75 kWh
Maxus MIFA 7 or Toyota Proace Verso — who wins where
Maxus MIFA 7 leads 7 to 1
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmMaxus MIFA 7 +143 km
- Battery kWhMaxus MIFA 7 +22 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmMaxus MIFA 7 −5.7 kWh/100 km
- Power PSMaxus MIFA 7 +109 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sNo data
- Top speed km/hMaxus MIFA 7 +50 km/h
- DC charging kWMaxus MIFA 7 +20 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minMaxus MIFA 7 −5 min
- Weight ↓ kgToyota Proace Verso −74 kg
- Boot lNo data
Technical data: Maxus MIFA 7 vs Toyota Proace Verso
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Maxus MIFA 7 90 kWh | Toyota Proace Verso Long 75 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 480 km | 337 km | Maxus +143 km |
| Battery | 90 kWh | 68 kWh | Maxus +22 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 18.8 kWh/100 km | 24.5 kWh/100 km | Maxus −5.7 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 120 kW | 100 kW | Maxus +20 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 5–80% ↓ | 40 min | 45 min | Maxus −5 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 9 km/min | 5.6 km/min | Maxus +3.4 km/min |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 245 PS | 136 PS | Maxus +109 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | — | 13.3 s | — |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 130 km/h | Maxus +50 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2239 kg | 2165 kg | Toyota −74 kg |
| Boot | 280 l | — | — |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Maxus |
| Length | 4907 mm | 5331 mm | Toyota +424 mm |
| Width | 1885 mm | 1924 mm | Toyota +39 mm |
| Height | 1756 mm | 1910 mm | Toyota +154 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2975 mm | 3275 mm | Toyota +300 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Maxus MIFA 7
Toyota Proace Verso
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Toyota Proace Verso
Other comparisons in this class: Van, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Maxus MIFA 7 or Toyota Proace Verso?
The Maxus MIFA 7 goes further: 480 km WLTP against the 337 km of the Toyota Proace Verso. That is a difference of 143 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Maxus MIFA 7 — its 90 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Toyota Proace Verso, with 68 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Maxus MIFA 7 or Toyota Proace Verso?
The Maxus MIFA 7 is stronger: 245 PS against the 136 PS of the Toyota Proace Verso. The gap is 109 PS.
Which charges faster?
The Maxus MIFA 7 accepts up to 120 kW DC, the Toyota Proace Verso up to 100 kW. Charging from 5 to 80% takes 40 and 45 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.