Ford e-Tourneo Custom vs Toyota Proace Verso
Biggest differences: Power — Ford e-Tourneo Custom 286 PS, Toyota Proace Verso 136 PS · DC charging — Ford e-Tourneo Custom 125 kW, Toyota Proace Verso 100 kW · Top speed — Ford e-Tourneo Custom 150 km/h, Toyota Proace Verso 130 km/h.
Ford e-Tourneo Custom
The Ford e-Tourneo Custom is an electric van in the D segment, offering four drive variants with power ranging from 218 horsepower to 286 horsepower.
Toyota Proace Verso
The Toyota Proace Verso is an electric van in the D-segment, offering a WLTP range of 337 km and the ability to fast charge with direct current.
Profile against the market: Ford e-Tourneo Custom vs Toyota Proace Verso
Ford e-Tourneo Custom210 kW RWD
Toyota Proace VersoLong 75 kWh
Ford e-Tourneo Custom or Toyota Proace Verso — who wins where
Ford e-Tourneo Custom leads 6 to 1
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmFord e-Tourneo Custom +4 km
- Battery kWhFord e-Tourneo Custom +3 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmFord e-Tourneo Custom −0.5 kWh/100 km
- Power PSFord e-Tourneo Custom +150 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sNo data
- Top speed km/hFord e-Tourneo Custom +20 km/h
- DC charging kWFord e-Tourneo Custom +25 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgToyota Proace Verso −240 kg
- Boot lNo data
Technical data: Ford e-Tourneo Custom vs Toyota Proace Verso
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Ford e-Tourneo Custom 210 kW RWD | Toyota Proace Verso Long 75 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 341 km | 337 km | Ford +4 km |
| Battery | 71 kWh | 68 kWh | Ford +3 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 24 kWh/100 km | 24.5 kWh/100 km | Ford −0.5 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 125 kW | 100 kW | Ford +25 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 29 min 10–80% | 45 min 5–80% | 16 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 8.2 km/min | 5.6 km/min | Ford +2.6 km/min |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 286 PS | 136 PS | Ford +150 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | — | 13.3 s | — |
| Top speed | 150 km/h | 130 km/h | Ford +20 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2405 kg | 2165 kg | Toyota −240 kg |
| Boot | 1152 l | — | — |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Ford |
| Length | 5050 mm | 5331 mm | Toyota +281 mm |
| Width | 2032 mm | 1924 mm | Ford +108 mm |
| Height | 2040 mm | 1910 mm | Ford +130 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3100 mm | 3275 mm | Toyota +175 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Ford e-Tourneo Custom
Toyota Proace Verso
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Ford e-Tourneo Custom
Toyota Proace Verso
Other comparisons in this class: Van, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
How do the drivetrains of the Ford e-Tourneo Custom and the Toyota Proace Verso differ?
The Ford e-Tourneo Custom has RWD and 286 PS. The Toyota Proace Verso has FWD and 136 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Ford e-Tourneo Custom — its 71 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Toyota Proace Verso, with 68 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Ford e-Tourneo Custom or Toyota Proace Verso?
The Ford e-Tourneo Custom is stronger: 286 PS against the 136 PS of the Toyota Proace Verso. The gap is 150 PS.
Which charges faster?
The Ford e-Tourneo Custom accepts up to 125 kW DC, the Toyota Proace Verso up to 100 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.