Citroën ë-SpaceTourer vs Toyota Proace Verso
Biggest differences: WLTP range — Citroën ë-SpaceTourer 349 km, Toyota Proace Verso 337 km · Consumption — Citroën ë-SpaceTourer 23.8 kWh/100 km, Toyota Proace Verso 24.5 kWh/100 km · Battery — Citroën ë-SpaceTourer 69.5 kWh, Toyota Proace Verso 68 kWh.
Citroën ë-SpaceTourer
The Citroën ë-SpaceTourer is an electric van in the D segment, offering two different range options and a power output of 136 horsepower.
Toyota Proace Verso
The Toyota Proace Verso is an electric van in the D-segment, offering a WLTP range of 337 km and the ability to fast charge with direct current.
Profile against the market: Citroën ë-SpaceTourer vs Toyota Proace Verso
Citroën ë-SpaceTourerM 75 kWh
Toyota Proace VersoLong 75 kWh
Citroën ë-SpaceTourer or Toyota Proace Verso — who wins where
Citroën ë-SpaceTourer leads 4 to 0
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmCitroën ë-SpaceTourer +12 km
- Battery kWhCitroën ë-SpaceTourer +1.5 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmCitroën ë-SpaceTourer −0.7 kWh/100 km
- Power PSNo difference
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sNo data
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgCitroën ë-SpaceTourer −29 kg
- Boot lNo data
Technical data: Citroën ë-SpaceTourer vs Toyota Proace Verso
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Citroën ë-SpaceTourer M 75 kWh | Toyota Proace Verso Long 75 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 349 km | 337 km | Citroën +12 km |
| Battery | 69.5 kWh | 68 kWh | Citroën +1.5 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 23.8 kWh/100 km | 24.5 kWh/100 km | Citroën −0.7 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 100 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 45 min 0–80% | 45 min 5–80% | No difference |
| Range per minute of charging | 6.2 km/min | 5.6 km/min | Citroën +0.6 km/min |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 136 PS | 136 PS | No difference |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | — | 13.3 s | — |
| Top speed | 130 km/h | 130 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2136 kg | 2165 kg | Citroën −29 kg |
| Boot | — | — | — |
| Length | 4980 mm | 5331 mm | Toyota +351 mm |
| Width | 1920 mm | 1924 mm | Toyota +4 mm |
| Height | 1890 mm | 1910 mm | Toyota +20 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3275 mm | 3275 mm | No difference |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Citroën ë-SpaceTourer
Toyota Proace Verso
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Citroën ë-SpaceTourer
Toyota Proace Verso
Other comparisons in this class: Van, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Citroën ë-SpaceTourer or Toyota Proace Verso?
The Citroën ë-SpaceTourer goes further: 349 km WLTP against the 337 km of the Toyota Proace Verso. That is a difference of 12 km.
Which charges faster?
The Citroën ë-SpaceTourer accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Toyota Proace Verso up to 100 kW.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Citroën ë-SpaceTourer uses less electricity: 23.8 kWh/100 km against 24.5 kWh/100 km in the Toyota Proace Verso. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 105 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.