Peugeot E-Traveller vs Toyota Proace Verso
Peugeot E-Traveller leads 5 to 1
Biggest differences: 0–100 km/h — Peugeot E-Traveller 14.2 s, Toyota Proace Verso 13.3 s · WLTP range — Peugeot E-Traveller 351 km, Toyota Proace Verso 337 km.
Peugeot E-Traveller
The Peugeot E-Traveller is an electric van in the D segment, offering two battery variants with a range from 223 km to 351 km in the WLTP cycle.
Toyota Proace Verso
Toyota Proace Verso is a D-segment passenger van (MPV), in model year 2026 in two lengths and with two batteries: WLTP range of 214 or 337 km.
Profile against the market: Peugeot E-Traveller vs Toyota Proace Verso
Peugeot E-TravellerStandard 75 kWh
Toyota Proace VersoLong 75 kWh
Peugeot E-Traveller or Toyota Proace Verso — who wins where
Peugeot E-Traveller leads 5 to 1
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmPeugeot E-Traveller +14 km
- Battery kWhPeugeot E-Traveller +1 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmPeugeot E-Traveller −0.2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSNo difference
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sToyota Proace Verso −0.9 s
- Top speed km/hPeugeot E-Traveller +2 km/h
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgPeugeot E-Traveller −29 kg
- Boot lNo data
Technical data: Peugeot E-Traveller vs Toyota Proace Verso
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Peugeot E-Traveller Standard 75 kWh | Toyota Proace Verso Long 75 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 351 km | 337 km | Peugeot +14 km |
| Battery | 69 kWh | 68 kWh | Peugeot +1 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 24.3 kWh/100 km | 24.5 kWh/100 km | Peugeot −0.2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 100 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 45 min 0–80% | 45 min 5–80% | No difference |
| Range per minute of charging | 6.2 km/min | 5.6 km/min | Peugeot +0.6 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 136 PS | 136 PS | No difference |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 14.2 s | 13.3 s | Toyota −0.9 s |
| Top speed | 132 km/h | 130 km/h | Peugeot +2 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2136 kg | 2165 kg | Peugeot −29 kg |
| Boot | — | — | — |
| Length | 4980 mm | 5331 mm | Toyota +351 mm |
| Width | 1920 mm | 1924 mm | Toyota +4 mm |
| Height | 1890 mm | 1910 mm | Toyota +20 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3275 mm | 3275 mm | No difference |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Peugeot E-Traveller
Toyota Proace Verso
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Peugeot E-Traveller
Toyota Proace Verso
Other comparisons in this class: Van, segment D
Peugeot E-Travellervs
Volkswagen e-Transporter KombiPeugeot E-Travellervs
Citroën ë-SpaceTourerPeugeot E-TravellervsVolkswagen e-CaravellePeugeot E-TravellervsVolkswagen ID. BuzzPeugeot E-Travellervs
Hyundai Staria ElectricToyota Proace VersovsCitroën ë-SpaceTourerToyota Proace VersovsVolkswagen ID. BuzzToyota Proace VersovsHyundai Staria ElectricFrequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Peugeot E-Traveller or Toyota Proace Verso?
The Peugeot E-Traveller goes further: 351 km WLTP against the 337 km of the Toyota Proace Verso. That is a difference of 14 km.
Which charges faster?
The Peugeot E-Traveller accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Toyota Proace Verso up to 100 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.