Ford e-Tourneo Custom vs Volkswagen ID. Buzz
Biggest differences: DC charging — Ford e-Tourneo Custom 125 kW, Volkswagen ID. Buzz 199 kW · WLTP range — Ford e-Tourneo Custom 341 km, Volkswagen ID. Buzz 498 km · Battery — Ford e-Tourneo Custom 71 kWh, Volkswagen ID. Buzz 86 kWh.
Ford e-Tourneo Custom
The Ford e-Tourneo Custom is an electric van in the D segment, offering four drive variants with power ranging from 218 horsepower to 286 horsepower.
Volkswagen ID. Buzz
The Volkswagen ID. Buzz is an electric van with seven different powertrain options, offering a range of up to 498 km according to the WLTP standard and a power output of up to 340 horsepower.
Profile against the market: Ford e-Tourneo Custom vs Volkswagen ID. Buzz
Ford e-Tourneo Custom210 kW RWD
Volkswagen ID. BuzzPro LWB
Ford e-Tourneo Custom or Volkswagen ID. Buzz — who wins where
Volkswagen ID. Buzz leads 6 to 1
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmVolkswagen ID. Buzz +157 km
- Battery kWhVolkswagen ID. Buzz +15 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmVolkswagen ID. Buzz −4 kWh/100 km
- Power PSNo difference
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sNo data
- Top speed km/hVolkswagen ID. Buzz +10 km/h
- DC charging kWVolkswagen ID. Buzz +74 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minVolkswagen ID. Buzz −1 min
- Weight ↓ kgFord e-Tourneo Custom −252 kg
- Boot lNo data
Technical data: Ford e-Tourneo Custom vs Volkswagen ID. Buzz
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Ford e-Tourneo Custom 210 kW RWD | Volkswagen ID. Buzz Pro LWB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 341 km | 498 km | Volkswagen +157 km |
| Battery | 71 kWh | 86 kWh | Volkswagen +15 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 24 kWh/100 km | 20 kWh/100 km | Volkswagen −4 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 125 kW | 199 kW | Volkswagen +74 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 29 min | 28 min | Volkswagen −1 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 8.2 km/min | 12.5 km/min | Volkswagen +4.3 km/min |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 286 PS | 286 PS | No difference |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | — | 7.9 s | — |
| Top speed | 150 km/h | 160 km/h | Volkswagen +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2405 kg | 2657 kg | Ford −252 kg |
| Boot | 1152 l | — | — |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 5050 mm | 4964 mm | Ford +86 mm |
| Width | 2032 mm | 1985 mm | Ford +47 mm |
| Height | 2040 mm | 1905 mm | Ford +135 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3100 mm | 3239 mm | Volkswagen +139 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Ford e-Tourneo Custom
Volkswagen ID. Buzz
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Ford e-Tourneo Custom
Volkswagen ID. Buzz
Other comparisons in this class: Van, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Ford e-Tourneo Custom or Volkswagen ID. Buzz?
The Volkswagen ID. Buzz goes further: 498 km WLTP against the 341 km of the Ford e-Tourneo Custom. That is a difference of 157 km.
Which charges faster?
The Ford e-Tourneo Custom accepts up to 125 kW DC, the Volkswagen ID. Buzz up to 199 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 29 and 28 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Volkswagen ID. Buzz uses less electricity: 20 kWh/100 km against 24 kWh/100 km in the Ford e-Tourneo Custom. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 600 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.