Maxus MIFA 7 vs Mercedes eVito Tourer
Biggest differences: DC charging — Maxus MIFA 7 120 kW, Mercedes eVito Tourer 50 kW · Consumption — Maxus MIFA 7 18.8 kWh/100 km, Mercedes eVito Tourer 27 kWh/100 km · WLTP range — Maxus MIFA 7 480 km, Mercedes eVito Tourer 367 km.
Maxus MIFA 7
An electric van in the D-segment, offering two battery capacity options with a shared motor power output.
Mercedes eVito Tourer
The Mercedes eVito Tourer is a van in the D segment with front-wheel drive, offering two battery options and a range of up to 367 km (WLTP).
Profile against the market: Maxus MIFA 7 vs Mercedes eVito Tourer
Maxus MIFA 790 kWh
Mercedes eVito TourerTourer 90 kWh
Maxus MIFA 7 or Mercedes eVito Tourer — who wins where
Maxus MIFA 7 leads 5 to 0
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmMaxus MIFA 7 +113 km
- Battery kWhNo difference
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmMaxus MIFA 7 −8.2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSMaxus MIFA 7 +41 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sNo data
- Top speed km/hMaxus MIFA 7 +40 km/h
- DC charging kWMaxus MIFA 7 +70 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgNo data
- Boot lNo data
Technical data: Maxus MIFA 7 vs Mercedes eVito Tourer
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Maxus MIFA 7 90 kWh | Mercedes eVito Tourer Tourer 90 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 480 km | 367 km | Maxus +113 km |
| Battery | 90 kWh | 90 kWh | No difference |
| Consumption ↓ | 18.8 kWh/100 km | 27 kWh/100 km | Maxus −8.2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 120 kW | 50 kW | Maxus +70 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 40 min 5–80% | 80 min 10–80% | 40 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 9 km/min | 3.2 km/min | Maxus +5.8 km/min |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 245 PS | 204 PS | Maxus +41 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | — | — | — |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 140 km/h | Maxus +40 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2239 kg | — | — |
| Boot | 280 l | — | — |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Maxus |
| Length | 4907 mm | 5140 mm | Mercedes +233 mm |
| Width | 1885 mm | 1928 mm | Mercedes +43 mm |
| Height | 1756 mm | 1930 mm | Mercedes +174 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2975 mm | 3200 mm | Mercedes +225 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Maxus MIFA 7
Mercedes eVito Tourer
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Mercedes eVito Tourer
Other comparisons in this class: Van, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Maxus MIFA 7 or Mercedes eVito Tourer?
The Maxus MIFA 7 goes further: 480 km WLTP against the 367 km of the Mercedes eVito Tourer. That is a difference of 113 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Maxus MIFA 7 — its 90 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Mercedes eVito Tourer, with 90 kWh, does not offer it.
Which charges faster?
The Maxus MIFA 7 accepts up to 120 kW DC, the Mercedes eVito Tourer up to 50 kW.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Maxus MIFA 7 uses less electricity: 18.8 kWh/100 km against 27 kWh/100 km in the Mercedes eVito Tourer. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 1230 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.