Maxus MIFA 7 vs Volkswagen e-Caravelle
Biggest differences: AC charging — Maxus MIFA 7 11 kW, Volkswagen e-Caravelle 7.4 kW · Battery — Maxus MIFA 7 90 kWh, Volkswagen e-Caravelle 70 kWh · Consumption — Maxus MIFA 7 18.8 kWh/100 km, Volkswagen e-Caravelle 23.8 kWh/100 km.
Maxus MIFA 7
An electric van in the D-segment, offering two battery capacity options with a shared motor power output.
Volkswagen e-Caravelle
The Volkswagen e-Caravelle is an electric van in the D segment, offering a WLTP range of 380 km and rear-wheel drive.
Profile against the market: Maxus MIFA 7 vs Volkswagen e-Caravelle
Maxus MIFA 790 kWh
Volkswagen e-Caravellee-Caravelle 70 kWh
Maxus MIFA 7 or Volkswagen e-Caravelle — who wins where
Maxus MIFA 7 leads 6 to 2
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmMaxus MIFA 7 +100 km
- Battery kWhMaxus MIFA 7 +20 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmMaxus MIFA 7 −5 kWh/100 km
- Power PSVolkswagen e-Caravelle +41 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sNo data
- Top speed km/hMaxus MIFA 7 +30 km/h
- DC charging kWVolkswagen e-Caravelle +5 kW
- AC charging kWMaxus MIFA 7 +3.6 kW
- Weight ↓ kgMaxus MIFA 7 −235 kg
- Boot lNo data
Technical data: Maxus MIFA 7 vs Volkswagen e-Caravelle
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Maxus MIFA 790 kWh | Volkswagen e-Caravellee-Caravelle 70 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 480 km | 380 km | Maxus +100 km |
| Battery | 90 kWh | 70 kWh | Maxus +20 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 18.8 kWh/100 km | 23.8 kWh/100 km | Maxus −5 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 120 kW | 125 kW | Volkswagen +5 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 7.4 kW | Maxus +3.6 kW |
| Charging ⚠ | 40 min 5–80% | 30 min 10–80% | 10 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 9 km/min | 8.9 km/min | Maxus +0.1 km/min |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 245 PS | 286 PS | Volkswagen +41 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | — | — | — |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 150 km/h | Maxus +30 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2239 kg | 2474 kg | Maxus −235 kg |
| Boot | 280 l | — | — |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Maxus |
| Length | 4907 mm | 5050 mm | Volkswagen +143 mm |
| Width | 1885 mm | 2032 mm | Volkswagen +147 mm |
| Height | 1756 mm | 1970 mm | Volkswagen +214 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2975 mm | 3100 mm | Volkswagen +125 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Maxus MIFA 7
Volkswagen e-Caravelle
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Volkswagen e-Caravelle
Other comparisons in this class: Van, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Maxus MIFA 7 or Volkswagen e-Caravelle?
The Maxus MIFA 7 goes further: 480 km WLTP against the 380 km of the Volkswagen e-Caravelle. That is a difference of 100 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Maxus MIFA 7 and the Volkswagen e-Caravelle differ?
The Maxus MIFA 7 has FWD and 245 PS. The Volkswagen e-Caravelle has RWD and 286 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Maxus MIFA 7 — its 90 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Volkswagen e-Caravelle, with 70 kWh, does not offer it.
Which charges faster?
The Maxus MIFA 7 accepts up to 120 kW DC, the Volkswagen e-Caravelle up to 125 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.

