Lynk & Co 02 vs SERES 3
Biggest differences: Power — Lynk & Co 02 272 PS, SERES 3 160 PS · 0–100 km/h — Lynk & Co 02 5.5 s, SERES 3 8.9 s · WLTP range — Lynk & Co 02 445 km, SERES 3 300 km.
Lynk & Co 02
The Lynk & Co 02 Long Range (Model Year 2025) is a compact SUV with rear-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 445 kilometers.
SERES 3
The electric SUV belongs to the C-segment and is equipped with front-wheel drive and a 54 kWh battery.
Profile against the market: Lynk & Co 02 vs SERES 3
Lynk & Co 02Long Range
SERES 3Standard
Lynk & Co 02 or SERES 3 — who wins where
Lynk & Co 02 leads 7 to 1
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmLynk & Co 02 +145 km
- Battery kWhLynk & Co 02 +12 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmLynk & Co 02 −0.5 kWh/100 km
- Power PSLynk & Co 02 +112 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sLynk & Co 02 −3.4 s
- Top speed km/hLynk & Co 02 +25 km/h
- DC charging kWNo data
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgSERES 3 −55 kg
- Boot lLynk & Co 02 +92 l
Technical data: Lynk & Co 02 vs SERES 3
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Lynk & Co 02 Long Range | SERES 3 Standard | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 445 km | 300 km | Lynk & Co +145 km |
| Battery | 66 kWh | 54 kWh | Lynk & Co +12 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 17.1 kWh/100 km | 17.6 kWh/100 km | Lynk & Co −0.5 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 150 kW | — | — |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 30 min | — | — |
| Range per minute of charging | 10.4 km/min | — | — |
| Voltage | 400 V | — | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 272 PS | 160 PS | Lynk & Co +112 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 5.5 s | 8.9 s | Lynk & Co −3.4 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 155 km/h | Lynk & Co +25 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1820 kg | 1765 kg | SERES −55 kg |
| Boot | 410 l | 318 l | Lynk & Co +92 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Lynk & Co |
| Length | 4460 mm | 4415 mm | Lynk & Co +45 mm |
| Width | 1845 mm | 1850 mm | SERES +5 mm |
| Height | 1573 mm | 1650 mm | SERES +77 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2755 mm | — | — |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Lynk & Co 02
SERES 3
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Lynk & Co 02
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Lynk & Co 02 or SERES 3?
The Lynk & Co 02 goes further: 445 km WLTP against the 300 km of the SERES 3. That is a difference of 145 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Lynk & Co 02 and the SERES 3 differ?
The Lynk & Co 02 has RWD and 272 PS. The SERES 3 has FWD and 160 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Lynk & Co 02 — its 66 kWh battery then works as a power source. The SERES 3, with 54 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Lynk & Co 02 or SERES 3?
The Lynk & Co 02 is stronger: 272 PS against the 160 PS of the SERES 3. The gap is 112 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.