Lotus Eletre vs Lucid Gravity

Biggest differences: AC charging — Lotus Eletre 22 kW, Lucid Gravity 11 kW · Power — Lotus Eletre 612 PS, Lucid Gravity 839 PS · 0–100 km/h — Lotus Eletre 4.5 s, Lucid Gravity 3.6 s.

Lotus Eletre

An electric SUV in the F-segment, combining high power with fast DC charging and a large cargo capacity.

Lucid Gravity

The Lucid Gravity is an SUV in the F-segment, offering two AWD (All-Wheel Drive) variants with high power and a range of up to 748 km in the Grand Touring version.

Profile against the market: Lotus Eletre vs Lucid Gravity

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Lotus Eletre or Lucid Gravity — who wins where

Lucid Gravity leads 7 to 3

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmLucid Gravity +148 km
    Lotus Eletre
    600
    Lucid Gravity
    748
  • Battery kWhLucid Gravity +11 kWh
    Lotus Eletre
    112
    Lucid Gravity
    123
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmLucid Gravity −3.2 kWh/100 km
    Lotus Eletre
    21.4
    Lucid Gravity
    18.2
  • Power PSLucid Gravity +227 PS
    Lotus Eletre
    612
    Lucid Gravity
    839
  • 0–100 km/h sLucid Gravity −0.9 s
    Lotus Eletre
    4.5
    Lucid Gravity
    3.6
  • Top speed km/hLotus Eletre +8 km/h
    Lotus Eletre
    258
    Lucid Gravity
    250
  • DC charging kWLucid Gravity +50 kW
    Lotus Eletre
    350
    Lucid Gravity
    400
  • AC charging kWLotus Eletre +11 kW
    Lotus Eletre
    22
    Lucid Gravity
    11
  • Charging minNo data
    Lotus Eletre
    20
    Lucid Gravity
  • Weight kgLotus Eletre −55 kg
    Lotus Eletre
    2595
    Lucid Gravity
    2650
  • Boot lLucid Gravity +92 l
    Lotus Eletre
    688
    Lucid Gravity
    780

Add a third car

Technical data: Lotus Eletre vs Lucid Gravity

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Lotus Eletre vs Lucid Gravity
Key parameters Lotus Eletre
Base
Lucid Gravity
Grand Touring
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range600 km748 kmLucid +148 km
Battery112 kWh123 kWhLucid +11 kWh
Consumption21.4 kWh/100 km18.2 kWh/100 kmLucid −3.2 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging350 kW400 kWLucid +50 kW
AC charging22 kW11 kWLotus +11 kW
Charging 10–80%20 min
Range per minute of charging21 km/min
Voltage800 V800 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power612 PS839 PSLucid +227 PS
0–100 km/h4.5 s3.6 sLucid −0.9 s
Top speed258 km/h250 km/hLotus +8 km/h
DrivetrainAWDAWD
Practicality
Weight2595 kg2650 kgLotus −55 kg
Boot688 l780 lLucid +92 l
Length5103 mm5034 mmLotus +69 mm
Width2019 mm2024 mmLucid +5 mm
Height1630 mm1660 mmLucid +30 mm
Wheelbase3019 mm3035 mmLucid +16 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Lotus Eletre

Cost per 100 km6.42
Monthly80
Yearly963

Lucid Gravity

Cost per 100 km5.46
Monthly68
Yearly819

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Lotus Eletre

Lucid Gravity

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment F

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Lotus Eletre or Lucid Gravity?

The Lucid Gravity goes further: 748 km WLTP against the 600 km of the Lotus Eletre. That is a difference of 148 km.

Which is more powerful — Lotus Eletre or Lucid Gravity?

The Lucid Gravity is stronger: 839 PS against the 612 PS of the Lotus Eletre. The gap is 227 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Lucid Gravity takes more: 780 l against 688 l in the Lotus Eletre. The difference is 92 l.

Which charges faster?

The Lotus Eletre accepts up to 350 kW DC, the Lucid Gravity up to 400 kW.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.