Leapmotor T03 vs Renault Twingo E-Tech
Biggest differences: Boot — Leapmotor T03 210 l, Renault Twingo E-Tech 360 l · AC charging — Leapmotor T03 6.6 kW, Renault Twingo E-Tech 11 kW · Battery — Leapmotor T03 37.3 kWh, Renault Twingo E-Tech 27.5 kWh.
Leapmotor T03
The Leapmotor T03 is a compact city hatchback in the A-segment, offering front-wheel drive and a range of up to 265 km according to the WLTP cycle.
Renault Twingo E-Tech
The Renault Twingo E-Tech is a city hatchback in the A segment, offering a range of 263 kilometers and compact dimensions.
Profile against the market: Leapmotor T03 vs Renault Twingo E-Tech
Leapmotor T03Electric
Renault Twingo E-Tech27.5 kWh
Leapmotor T03 or Renault Twingo E-Tech — who wins where
Renault Twingo E-Tech leads 6 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmLeapmotor T03 +2 km
- Battery kWhLeapmotor T03 +9.8 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmRenault Twingo E-Tech −4.1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSLeapmotor T03 +15 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sRenault Twingo E-Tech −0.6 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWRenault Twingo E-Tech +2 kW
- AC charging kWRenault Twingo E-Tech +4.4 kW
- Weight ↓ kgRenault Twingo E-Tech −10 kg
- Boot lRenault Twingo E-Tech +150 l
Technical data: Leapmotor T03 vs Renault Twingo E-Tech
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Leapmotor T03 Electric | Renault Twingo E-Tech 27.5 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 265 km | 263 km | Leapmotor +2 km |
| Battery | 37.3 kWh | 27.5 kWh | Leapmotor +9.8 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 16.3 kWh/100 km | 12.2 kWh/100 km | Renault −4.1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 48 kW | 50 kW | Renault +2 kW |
| AC charging | 6.6 kW | 11 kW | Renault +4.4 kW |
| Charging ⚠ | 36 min 30–80% | 30 min 10–80% | 6 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 3.7 km/min | 6.1 km/min | Renault +2.4 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 95 PS | 80 PS | Leapmotor +15 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 12.7 s | 12.1 s | Renault −0.6 s |
| Top speed | 130 km/h | 130 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1210 kg | 1200 kg | Renault −10 kg |
| Boot | 210 l | 360 l | Renault +150 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Renault |
| Length | 3620 mm | 3789 mm | Renault +169 mm |
| Width | 1652 mm | 1720 mm | Renault +68 mm |
| Height | 1592 mm | 1495 mm | Leapmotor +97 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2400 mm | 2500 mm | Renault +100 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Leapmotor T03
Renault Twingo E-Tech
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Leapmotor T03
Renault Twingo E-Tech
Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment A
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Renault Twingo E-Tech — its 27.5 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Leapmotor T03, with 37.3 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Renault Twingo E-Tech takes more: 360 l against 210 l in the Leapmotor T03. The difference is 150 l.
Which charges faster?
The Leapmotor T03 accepts up to 48 kW DC, the Renault Twingo E-Tech up to 50 kW.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Renault Twingo E-Tech uses less electricity: 12.2 kWh/100 km against 16.3 kWh/100 km in the Leapmotor T03. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 615 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.