Leapmotor T03 vs Smart #2

Smart #2 leads 5 to 2

Biggest differences: Boot — Leapmotor T03 210 l, Smart #2 305 l · DC charging — Leapmotor T03 45 kW, Smart #2 65 kW · Power — Leapmotor T03 95 PS, Smart #2 82 PS.

Leapmotor T03

Leapmotor T03 is an urban A-segment hatchback with a 37.3 kWh battery and a WLTP range of 275 km in model year 2026.

Smart #2

The Smart #2 is a two-seater city car in the A segment: it features a 35.8 kWh battery, a WLTP range of 290 km, a power output of 82 horsepower, and DC fast charging up to 65 kW.

Profile against the market: Leapmotor T03 vs Smart #2

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Leapmotor T03 or Smart #2 — who wins where

Smart #2 leads 5 to 2

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmSmart #2 +15 km
    Leapmotor T03
    275
    Smart #2
    290
  • Battery kWhLeapmotor T03 +1.5 kWh
    Leapmotor T03
    37.3
    Smart #2
    35.8
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmNo difference
    Leapmotor T03
    13.6
    Smart #2
    13.6
  • Power PSLeapmotor T03 +13 PS
    Leapmotor T03
    95
    Smart #2
    82
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sSmart #2 −1.1 s
    Leapmotor T03
    12.7
    Smart #2
    11.6
  • Top speed km/hSmart #2 +10 km/h
    Leapmotor T03
    130
    Smart #2
    140
  • DC charging kWSmart #2 +20 kW
    Leapmotor T03
    45
    Smart #2
    65
  • AC charging kWNo data
    Leapmotor T03
    —
    Smart #2
    11
  • Charging ↓ minNo data
    Leapmotor T03
    36
    Smart #2
    —
  • Weight ↓ kgNo data
    Leapmotor T03
    —
    Smart #2
    1140
  • Boot lSmart #2 +95 l
    Leapmotor T03
    210
    Smart #2
    305

Add a third car

Technical data: Leapmotor T03 vs Smart #2

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Leapmotor T03 vs Smart #2
Key parameters Leapmotor T03
Electric · 2026 model year
Smart #2
Pure+
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range275 km290 kmSmart +15 km
Battery37.3 kWh35.8 kWhLeapmotor +1.5 kWh
Consumption ↓13.6 kWh/100 km13.6 kWh/100 kmNo difference
Charging
DC charging45 kW65 kWSmart +20 kW
AC charging—11 kW—
Charging 30–80% ↓36 min——
Range per minute of charging3.8 km/min——
Voltage———
Performance and drivetrain
Power95 PS82 PSLeapmotor +13 PS
0–100 km/h ↓12.7 s11.6 sSmart −1.1 s
Top speed130 km/h140 km/hSmart +10 km/h
DrivetrainFWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight ↓—1140 kg—
Boot210 l305 lSmart +95 l
Length3620 mm2746 mmLeapmotor +874 mm
Width—1760 mm—
Height—1555 mm—
Wheelbase—1875 mm—

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Leapmotor T03

Cost per 100 km4.08
Monthly51
Yearly612

Smart #2

Cost per 100 km4.08
Monthly51
Yearly612

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Leapmotor T03

Smart #2

Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment A

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Leapmotor T03 or Smart #2?

The Smart #2 goes further: 290 km WLTP against the 275 km of the Leapmotor T03. That is a difference of 15 km.

Why does the Leapmotor T03 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Smart #2?

The Leapmotor T03 carries 37.3 kWh and covers 275 km, while the Smart #2 with its 35.8 kWh battery does 290 km. Energy use decides it: 13.6 against 13.6 kWh/100 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Leapmotor T03 and the Smart #2 differ?

The Leapmotor T03 has FWD and 95 PS. The Smart #2 has RWD and 82 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Smart #2 takes more: 305 l against 210 l in the Leapmotor T03. The difference is 95 l.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.