Abarth 500e vs Renault Twingo E-Tech
Biggest differences: Boot — Abarth 500e 185 l, Renault Twingo E-Tech 360 l · Power — Abarth 500e 155 PS, Renault Twingo E-Tech 80 PS · 0–100 km/h — Abarth 500e 7 s, Renault Twingo E-Tech 12.1 s.
Abarth 500e
This is an electric hatchback in the A-segment, combining compact dimensions with a top speed of up to 155 km/h and acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in just 7 seconds.
Renault Twingo E-Tech
The Renault Twingo E-Tech is a city hatchback in the A segment, offering a range of 263 kilometers and compact dimensions.
Profile against the market: Abarth 500e vs Renault Twingo E-Tech
Abarth 500eTurismo
Renault Twingo E-Tech27.5 kWh
Abarth 500e or Renault Twingo E-Tech — who wins where
Abarth 500e leads 5 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmRenault Twingo E-Tech +10 km
- Battery kWhAbarth 500e +10.3 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmRenault Twingo E-Tech −5.9 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAbarth 500e +75 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAbarth 500e −5.1 s
- Top speed km/hAbarth 500e +25 km/h
- DC charging kWAbarth 500e +35 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgRenault Twingo E-Tech −210 kg
- Boot lRenault Twingo E-Tech +175 l
Technical data: Abarth 500e vs Renault Twingo E-Tech
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Abarth 500e Turismo | Renault Twingo E-Tech 27.5 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 253 km | 263 km | Renault +10 km |
| Battery | 37.8 kWh | 27.5 kWh | Abarth +10.3 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 18.1 kWh/100 km | 12.2 kWh/100 km | Renault −5.9 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 85 kW | 50 kW | Abarth +35 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 35 min 0–80% | 30 min 10–80% | 5 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 5.8 km/min | 6.1 km/min | Renault +0.3 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 155 PS | 80 PS | Abarth +75 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7 s | 12.1 s | Abarth −5.1 s |
| Top speed | 155 km/h | 130 km/h | Abarth +25 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1410 kg | 1200 kg | Renault −210 kg |
| Boot | 185 l | 360 l | Renault +175 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Renault |
| Length | 3673 mm | 3789 mm | Renault +116 mm |
| Width | 1683 mm | 1720 mm | Renault +37 mm |
| Height | 1518 mm | 1495 mm | Abarth +23 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2322 mm | 2500 mm | Renault +178 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Abarth 500e
Renault Twingo E-Tech
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Abarth 500e
Renault Twingo E-Tech
Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment A
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Abarth 500e or Renault Twingo E-Tech?
The Renault Twingo E-Tech goes further: 263 km WLTP against the 253 km of the Abarth 500e. That is a difference of 10 km.
Why does the Abarth 500e have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Renault Twingo E-Tech?
The Abarth 500e carries 37.8 kWh and covers 253 km, while the Renault Twingo E-Tech with its 27.5 kWh battery does 263 km. Energy use decides it: 18.1 against 12.2 kWh/100 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Renault Twingo E-Tech — its 27.5 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Abarth 500e, with 37.8 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Abarth 500e or Renault Twingo E-Tech?
The Abarth 500e is stronger: 155 PS against the 80 PS of the Renault Twingo E-Tech. The gap is 75 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.