Abarth 500e vs Dacia Spring

Abarth 500e leads 6 to 3

Biggest differences: Power — Abarth 500e 155 PS, Dacia Spring 82 PS · Boot — Abarth 500e 185 l, Dacia Spring 325 l · 0–100 km/h — Abarth 500e 7 s, Dacia Spring 12.1 s.

Abarth 500e

This is an electric hatchback in the A-segment, combining compact dimensions with a top speed of up to 155 km/h and acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in just 7 seconds.

Dacia Spring

The second-generation Dacia Spring is a city hatchback in the A segment, featuring a 27.5 kWh battery, a WLTP range of 250 km, and a power output of 82 horsepower.

Profile against the market: Abarth 500e vs Dacia Spring

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Abarth 500e or Dacia Spring — who wins where

Abarth 500e leads 6 to 3

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmAbarth 500e +3 km
    Abarth 500e
    253
    Dacia Spring
    250
  • Battery kWhAbarth 500e +10.3 kWh
    Abarth 500e
    37.8
    Dacia Spring
    27.5
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmDacia Spring −5.4 kWh/100 km
    Abarth 500e
    18.1
    Dacia Spring
    12.7
  • Power PSAbarth 500e +73 PS
    Abarth 500e
    155
    Dacia Spring
    82
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sAbarth 500e −5.1 s
    Abarth 500e
    7
    Dacia Spring
    12.1
  • Top speed km/hAbarth 500e +25 km/h
    Abarth 500e
    155
    Dacia Spring
    130
  • DC charging kWAbarth 500e +35 kW
    Abarth 500e
    85
    Dacia Spring
    50
  • AC charging kWNo data
    Abarth 500e
    11
    Dacia Spring
    —
  • Weight ↓ kgDacia Spring −223 kg
    Abarth 500e
    1410
    Dacia Spring
    1187
  • Boot lDacia Spring +140 l
    Abarth 500e
    185
    Dacia Spring
    325

Add a third car

Technical data: Abarth 500e vs Dacia Spring

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Abarth 500e vs Dacia Spring
Key parameters Abarth 500e
Turismo
Dacia Spring
Electric 80
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range253 km250 kmAbarth +3 km
Battery37.8 kWh27.5 kWhAbarth +10.3 kWh
Consumption ↓18.1 kWh/100 km12.7 kWh/100 kmDacia −5.4 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging85 kW50 kWAbarth +35 kW
AC charging11 kW——
Charging ⚠35 min 0–80%30 min 10–80%5 min
Range per minute of charging5.8 km/min5.8 km/minNo difference
Voltage400 V——
Performance and drivetrain
Power155 PS82 PSAbarth +73 PS
0–100 km/h ↓7 s12.1 sAbarth −5.1 s
Top speed155 km/h130 km/hAbarth +25 km/h
DrivetrainFWDFWD—
Practicality
Weight ↓1410 kg1187 kgDacia −223 kg
Boot185 l325 lDacia +140 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Dacia
Length3673 mm3855 mmDacia +182 mm
Width1683 mm1722 mmDacia +39 mm
Height1518 mm1519 mmDacia +1 mm
Wheelbase2322 mm2492 mmDacia +170 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Abarth 500e

Cost per 100 km5.43
Monthly68
Yearly815

Dacia Spring

Cost per 100 km3.81
Monthly48
Yearly571

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Abarth 500e

Dacia Spring

Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment A

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Dacia Spring — its 27.5 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Abarth 500e, with 37.8 kWh, does not offer it.

Which is more powerful — Abarth 500e or Dacia Spring?

The Abarth 500e is stronger: 155 PS against the 82 PS of the Dacia Spring. The gap is 73 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Dacia Spring takes more: 325 l against 185 l in the Abarth 500e. The difference is 140 l.

Which charges faster?

The Abarth 500e accepts up to 85 kW DC, the Dacia Spring up to 50 kW.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.