Leapmotor C10 vs Subaru Solterra
It's a tie: 5 to 5
Biggest differences: AC charging — Leapmotor C10 11 kW, Subaru Solterra 22 kW · 0–100 km/h — Leapmotor C10 6.6 s, Subaru Solterra 5.1 s · Consumption — Leapmotor C10 18 kWh/100 km, Subaru Solterra 14.3 kWh/100 km.
Leapmotor C10
Leapmotor C10 is a D-segment SUV in three variants: WLTP range from 420 to 510 km, power from 218 to 571 hp.
Subaru Solterra
Subaru Solterra is a D-segment SUV with all-wheel drive, in model year 2026 with 343 hp and a WLTP range of 511 km.
Profile against the market: Leapmotor C10 vs Subaru Solterra
Leapmotor C10Design Long Range RWD (81,9 kWh)
Subaru SolterraAWD · 2026 model year
Leapmotor C10 or Subaru Solterra — who wins where
It's a tie: 5 to 5
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmSubaru Solterra +1 km
- Battery kWhLeapmotor C10 +8.8 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmSubaru Solterra −3.7 kWh/100 km
- Power PSSubaru Solterra +44 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sSubaru Solterra −1.5 s
- Top speed km/hLeapmotor C10 +30 km/h
- DC charging kWLeapmotor C10 +30 kW
- AC charging kWSubaru Solterra +11 kW
- Weight ↓ kgLeapmotor C10 −87 kg
- Boot lLeapmotor C10 +14 l
Technical data: Leapmotor C10 vs Subaru Solterra
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Leapmotor C10 Design Long Range RWD (81,9 kWh) | Subaru Solterra AWD · 2026 model year | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 510 km | 511 km | Subaru +1 km |
| Battery | 81.9 kWh | 73.1 kWh | Leapmotor +8.8 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 18 kWh/100 km | 14.3 kWh/100 km | Subaru −3.7 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 180 kW | 150 kW | Leapmotor +30 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 22 kW | Subaru +11 kW |
| Charging ⚠ | 22 min 30–80% | 28 min 10–80% | 6 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 11.6 km/min | 12.8 km/min | Subaru +1.2 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | — | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 299 PS | 343 PS | Subaru +44 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 5.1 s | Subaru −1.5 s |
| Top speed | 190 km/h | 160 km/h | Leapmotor +30 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2030 kg | 2117 kg | Leapmotor −87 kg |
| Boot | 435 l | 421 l | Leapmotor +14 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Leapmotor |
| Length | 4739 mm | — | — |
| Width | 1900 mm | — | — |
| Height | 1680 mm | — | — |
| Wheelbase | 2825 mm | — | — |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Leapmotor C10
Subaru Solterra
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Leapmotor C10
Subaru Solterra
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Why does the Leapmotor C10 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Subaru Solterra?
The Leapmotor C10 carries 81.9 kWh and covers 510 km, while the Subaru Solterra with its 73.1 kWh battery does 511 km. Energy use decides it: 18 against 14.3 kWh/100 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Leapmotor C10 and the Subaru Solterra differ?
The Leapmotor C10 has RWD and 299 PS. The Subaru Solterra has AWD and 343 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Leapmotor C10 — its 81.9 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Subaru Solterra, with 73.1 kWh, does not offer it.
Which charges faster?
The Leapmotor C10 accepts up to 180 kW DC, the Subaru Solterra up to 150 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.