Subaru Solterra vs Toyota bZ4X
Biggest differences: WLTP range — Subaru Solterra 466 km, Toyota bZ4X 569 km · Consumption — Subaru Solterra 15.4 kWh/100 km, Toyota bZ4X 13.9 kWh/100 km · 0–100 km/h — Subaru Solterra 6.9 s, Toyota bZ4X 7.4 s.
Subaru Solterra
The Subaru Solterra is a compact SUV with AWD and a WLTP range of 466 km.
Toyota bZ4X
The Toyota bZ4X is a compact SUV (segment D) that offers both front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive options, as well as battery packs with varying capacities.
Profile against the market: Subaru Solterra vs Toyota bZ4X
Subaru SolterraAWD
Toyota bZ4XFWD 73.1 kWh
Subaru Solterra or Toyota bZ4X — who wins where
Toyota bZ4X leads 5 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmToyota bZ4X +103 km
- Battery kWhSubaru Solterra +2.4 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmToyota bZ4X −1.5 kWh/100 km
- Power PSToyota bZ4X +6 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sSubaru Solterra −0.5 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minToyota bZ4X −2 min
- Weight ↓ kgToyota bZ4X −80 kg
- Boot lNo difference
Technical data: Subaru Solterra vs Toyota bZ4X
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Subaru Solterra AWD | Toyota bZ4X FWD 73.1 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 466 km | 569 km | Toyota +103 km |
| Battery | 71.4 kWh | 69 kWh | Subaru +2.4 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.4 kWh/100 km | 13.9 kWh/100 km | Toyota −1.5 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 150 kW | 150 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 30 min | 28 min | Toyota −2 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 10.9 km/min | 14.2 km/min | Toyota +3.3 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 218 PS | 224 PS | Toyota +6 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.9 s | 7.4 s | Subaru −0.5 s |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 160 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | AWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2010 kg | 1930 kg | Toyota −80 kg |
| Boot | 452 l | 452 l | No difference |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Toyota |
| Length | 4690 mm | 4690 mm | No difference |
| Width | 1860 mm | 1860 mm | No difference |
| Height | 1650 mm | 1650 mm | No difference |
| Wheelbase | 2850 mm | 2850 mm | No difference |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Subaru Solterra
Toyota bZ4X
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Subaru Solterra
Toyota bZ4X
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Subaru Solterra or Toyota bZ4X?
The Toyota bZ4X goes further: 569 km WLTP against the 466 km of the Subaru Solterra. That is a difference of 103 km.
Why does the Subaru Solterra have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Toyota bZ4X?
The Subaru Solterra carries 71.4 kWh and covers 466 km, while the Toyota bZ4X with its 69 kWh battery does 569 km. Energy use decides it: 15.4 against 13.9 kWh/100 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Subaru Solterra and the Toyota bZ4X differ?
The Subaru Solterra has AWD and 218 PS. The Toyota bZ4X has FWD and 224 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Toyota bZ4X — its 69 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Subaru Solterra, with 71.4 kWh, does not offer it.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.