Leapmotor C10 vs SERES 5

Biggest differences: DC charging — Leapmotor C10 180 kW, SERES 5 100 kW · Power — Leapmotor C10 299 PS, SERES 5 490 PS · 0–100 km/h — Leapmotor C10 6.2 s, SERES 5 4.5 s.

Leapmotor C10

The Leapmotor C10 is an SUV in the D segment, offering two rear-wheel drive (RWD) variants with different battery capacities and performance specifications.

SERES 5

The SERES 5 is a D-segment SUV with all-wheel drive (AWD) and a WLTP range of up to 480 kilometers, offering a power output of 490 horsepower.

Profile against the market: Leapmotor C10 vs SERES 5

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Leapmotor C10 or SERES 5 — who wins where

SERES 5 leads 4 to 3

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmLeapmotor C10 +30 km
    Leapmotor C10
    510
    SERES 5
    480
  • Battery kWhLeapmotor C10 +1.9 kWh
    Leapmotor C10
    81.9
    SERES 5
    80
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmSERES 5 −1.9 kWh/100 km
    Leapmotor C10
    18
    SERES 5
    16.1
  • Power PSSERES 5 +191 PS
    Leapmotor C10
    299
    SERES 5
    490
  • 0–100 km/h sSERES 5 −1.7 s
    Leapmotor C10
    6.2
    SERES 5
    4.5
  • Top speed km/hSERES 5 +10 km/h
    Leapmotor C10
    190
    SERES 5
    200
  • DC charging kWLeapmotor C10 +80 kW
    Leapmotor C10
    180
    SERES 5
    100
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Leapmotor C10
    11
    SERES 5
    11
  • Charging minNo data
    Leapmotor C10
    22
    SERES 5
  • Weight kgNo data
    Leapmotor C10
    SERES 5
  • Boot lNo data
    Leapmotor C10
    SERES 5
    450

Add a third car

Technical data: Leapmotor C10 vs SERES 5

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Leapmotor C10 vs SERES 5
Key parameters Leapmotor C10
Design Long Range RWD (81,9 kWh)
SERES 5
Long Range AWD
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range510 km480 kmLeapmotor +30 km
Battery81.9 kWh80 kWhLeapmotor +1.9 kWh
Consumption18 kWh/100 km16.1 kWh/100 kmSERES −1.9 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging180 kW100 kWLeapmotor +80 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 30–80%22 min
Range per minute of charging11.6 km/min
Voltage800 V400 VLeapmotor +400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power299 PS490 PSSERES +191 PS
0–100 km/h6.2 s4.5 sSERES −1.7 s
Top speed190 km/h200 km/hSERES +10 km/h
DrivetrainRWDAWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight
Boot450 l
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length4739 mm4700 mmLeapmotor +39 mm
Width1900 mm1930 mmSERES +30 mm
Height1680 mm1625 mmLeapmotor +55 mm
Wheelbase2825 mm2880 mmSERES +55 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Leapmotor C10

Cost per 100 km5.4
Monthly67
Yearly810

SERES 5

Cost per 100 km4.83
Monthly60
Yearly725

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Leapmotor C10

SERES 5

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Leapmotor C10 or SERES 5?

The Leapmotor C10 goes further: 510 km WLTP against the 480 km of the SERES 5. That is a difference of 30 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Leapmotor C10 and the SERES 5 differ?

The Leapmotor C10 has RWD and 299 PS. The SERES 5 has AWD and 490 PS.

Which is more powerful — Leapmotor C10 or SERES 5?

The SERES 5 is stronger: 490 PS against the 299 PS of the Leapmotor C10. The gap is 191 PS.

Which charges faster?

The Leapmotor C10 accepts up to 180 kW DC, the SERES 5 up to 100 kW.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.