Leapmotor B10 vs SERES 3

Biggest differences: WLTP range — Leapmotor B10 434 km, SERES 3 300 km · Power — Leapmotor B10 218 PS, SERES 3 160 PS · Boot — Leapmotor B10 430 l, SERES 3 318 l.

Leapmotor B10

The Leapmotor B10 is a compact SUV with rear-wheel drive, offering a WLTP range of up to 434 kilometers in the Long Range version.

SERES 3

The electric SUV belongs to the C-segment and is equipped with front-wheel drive and a 54 kWh battery.

Profile against the market: Leapmotor B10 vs SERES 3

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Leapmotor B10 or SERES 3 — who wins where

Leapmotor B10 leads 7 to 1

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmLeapmotor B10 +134 km
    Leapmotor B10
    434
    SERES 3
    300
  • Battery kWhLeapmotor B10 +13.1 kWh
    Leapmotor B10
    67.1
    SERES 3
    54
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmLeapmotor B10 −0.3 kWh/100 km
    Leapmotor B10
    17.3
    SERES 3
    17.6
  • Power PSLeapmotor B10 +58 PS
    Leapmotor B10
    218
    SERES 3
    160
  • 0–100 km/h sLeapmotor B10 −0.9 s
    Leapmotor B10
    8
    SERES 3
    8.9
  • Top speed km/hLeapmotor B10 +15 km/h
    Leapmotor B10
    170
    SERES 3
    155
  • DC charging kWNo data
    Leapmotor B10
    100
    SERES 3
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Leapmotor B10
    11
    SERES 3
    11
  • Charging minNo data
    Leapmotor B10
    20
    SERES 3
  • Weight kgSERES 3 −80 kg
    Leapmotor B10
    1845
    SERES 3
    1765
  • Boot lLeapmotor B10 +112 l
    Leapmotor B10
    430
    SERES 3
    318

Add a third car

Technical data: Leapmotor B10 vs SERES 3

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Leapmotor B10 vs SERES 3
Key parameters Leapmotor B10
Long Range
SERES 3
Standard
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range434 km300 kmLeapmotor +134 km
Battery67.1 kWh54 kWhLeapmotor +13.1 kWh
Consumption17.3 kWh/100 km17.6 kWh/100 kmLeapmotor −0.3 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging100 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 30–80%20 min
Range per minute of charging10.9 km/min
Voltage400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power218 PS160 PSLeapmotor +58 PS
0–100 km/h8 s8.9 sLeapmotor −0.9 s
Top speed170 km/h155 km/hLeapmotor +15 km/h
DrivetrainRWDFWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight1845 kg1765 kgSERES −80 kg
Boot430 l318 lLeapmotor +112 l
V2L (external power)YesNoonly Leapmotor
Length4515 mm4415 mmLeapmotor +100 mm
Width1885 mm1850 mmLeapmotor +35 mm
Height1655 mm1650 mmLeapmotor +5 mm
Wheelbase2735 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Leapmotor B10

Cost per 100 km5.19
Monthly65
Yearly779

SERES 3

Cost per 100 km5.28
Monthly66
Yearly792

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Leapmotor B10

SERES 3

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Leapmotor B10 or SERES 3?

The Leapmotor B10 goes further: 434 km WLTP against the 300 km of the SERES 3. That is a difference of 134 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Leapmotor B10 and the SERES 3 differ?

The Leapmotor B10 has RWD and 218 PS. The SERES 3 has FWD and 160 PS.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Leapmotor B10 — its 67.1 kWh battery then works as a power source. The SERES 3, with 54 kWh, does not offer it.

Which is more powerful — Leapmotor B10 or SERES 3?

The Leapmotor B10 is stronger: 218 PS against the 160 PS of the SERES 3. The gap is 58 PS.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.