Leapmotor B10 vs Lynk & Co 02
Biggest differences: DC charging — Leapmotor B10 100 kW, Lynk & Co 02 150 kW · 0–100 km/h — Leapmotor B10 8 s, Lynk & Co 02 5.5 s · Power — Leapmotor B10 218 PS, Lynk & Co 02 272 PS.
Leapmotor B10
The Leapmotor B10 is a compact SUV with rear-wheel drive, offering a WLTP range of up to 434 kilometers in the Long Range version.
Lynk & Co 02
The Lynk & Co 02 Long Range (Model Year 2025) is a compact SUV with rear-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 445 kilometers.
Profile against the market: Leapmotor B10 vs Lynk & Co 02
Leapmotor B10Long Range
Lynk & Co 02Long Range
Leapmotor B10 or Lynk & Co 02 — who wins where
Lynk & Co 02 leads 7 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmLynk & Co 02 +11 km
- Battery kWhLeapmotor B10 +1.1 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmLynk & Co 02 −0.2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSLynk & Co 02 +54 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sLynk & Co 02 −2.5 s
- Top speed km/hLynk & Co 02 +10 km/h
- DC charging kWLynk & Co 02 +50 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgLynk & Co 02 −25 kg
- Boot lLeapmotor B10 +20 l
Technical data: Leapmotor B10 vs Lynk & Co 02
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Leapmotor B10 Long Range | Lynk & Co 02 Long Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 434 km | 445 km | Lynk & Co +11 km |
| Battery | 67.1 kWh | 66 kWh | Leapmotor +1.1 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 17.3 kWh/100 km | 17.1 kWh/100 km | Lynk & Co −0.2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 150 kW | Lynk & Co +50 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 20 min 30–80% | 30 min 10–80% | 10 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 10.9 km/min | 10.4 km/min | Leapmotor +0.5 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 218 PS | 272 PS | Lynk & Co +54 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 8 s | 5.5 s | Lynk & Co −2.5 s |
| Top speed | 170 km/h | 180 km/h | Lynk & Co +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1845 kg | 1820 kg | Lynk & Co −25 kg |
| Boot | 430 l | 410 l | Leapmotor +20 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4515 mm | 4460 mm | Leapmotor +55 mm |
| Width | 1885 mm | 1845 mm | Leapmotor +40 mm |
| Height | 1655 mm | 1573 mm | Leapmotor +82 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2735 mm | 2755 mm | Lynk & Co +20 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Leapmotor B10
Lynk & Co 02
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Leapmotor B10
Lynk & Co 02
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Leapmotor B10 or Lynk & Co 02?
The Lynk & Co 02 goes further: 445 km WLTP against the 434 km of the Leapmotor B10. That is a difference of 11 km.
Why does the Leapmotor B10 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Lynk & Co 02?
The Leapmotor B10 carries 67.1 kWh and covers 434 km, while the Lynk & Co 02 with its 66 kWh battery does 445 km. Energy use decides it: 17.3 against 17.1 kWh/100 km.
Which charges faster?
The Leapmotor B10 accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Lynk & Co 02 up to 150 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.