Lancia Ypsilon vs Peugeot e-208

Biggest differences: AC charging — Lancia Ypsilon 7.4 kW, Peugeot e-208 11 kW · Boot — Lancia Ypsilon 309 l, Peugeot e-208 265 l · 0–100 km/h — Lancia Ypsilon 9 s, Peugeot e-208 8.2 s.

Lancia Ypsilon

The Lancia Ypsilon is a city hatchback in the B-segment, offered with two electric powertrain configurations offering different power outputs and performance characteristics.

Peugeot e-208

The Peugeot e-208 is a city hatchback in the B-segment, offered with three different powertrain options, each offering varying power outputs and battery capacities.

Profile against the market: Lancia Ypsilon vs Peugeot e-208

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Lancia Ypsilon or Peugeot e-208 — who wins where

Peugeot e-208 leads 4 to 2

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmPeugeot e-208 +8 km
    Lancia Ypsilon
    425
    Peugeot e-208
    433
  • Battery kWhNo difference
    Lancia Ypsilon
    51
    Peugeot e-208
    51
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmLancia Ypsilon −0.5 kWh/100 km
    Lancia Ypsilon
    14.4
    Peugeot e-208
    14.9
  • Power PSNo difference
    Lancia Ypsilon
    156
    Peugeot e-208
    156
  • 0–100 km/h sPeugeot e-208 −0.8 s
    Lancia Ypsilon
    9
    Peugeot e-208
    8.2
  • Top speed km/hNo difference
    Lancia Ypsilon
    150
    Peugeot e-208
    150
  • DC charging kWNo difference
    Lancia Ypsilon
    100
    Peugeot e-208
    100
  • AC charging kWPeugeot e-208 +3.6 kW
    Lancia Ypsilon
    7.4
    Peugeot e-208
    11
  • Weight kgPeugeot e-208 −106 kg
    Lancia Ypsilon
    1561
    Peugeot e-208
    1455
  • Boot lLancia Ypsilon +44 l
    Lancia Ypsilon
    309
    Peugeot e-208
    265

Add a third car

Technical data: Lancia Ypsilon vs Peugeot e-208

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Lancia Ypsilon vs Peugeot e-208
Key parameters Lancia Ypsilon
Electric
Peugeot e-208
GT 156
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range425 km433 kmPeugeot +8 km
Battery51 kWh51 kWhNo difference
Consumption14.4 kWh/100 km14.9 kWh/100 kmLancia −0.5 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging100 kW100 kWNo difference
AC charging7.4 kW11 kWPeugeot +3.6 kW
Charging 28 min 10–80%35 min 0–80%7 min
Range per minute of charging10.6 km/min9.9 km/minLancia +0.7 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power156 PS156 PSNo difference
0–100 km/h9 s8.2 sPeugeot −0.8 s
Top speed150 km/h150 km/hNo difference
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight1561 kg1455 kgPeugeot −106 kg
Boot309 l265 lLancia +44 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Peugeot
Length4080 mm4055 mmLancia +25 mm
Width1768 mm1745 mmLancia +23 mm
Height1440 mm1430 mmLancia +10 mm
Wheelbase2545 mm2540 mmLancia +5 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Lancia Ypsilon

Cost per 100 km4.32
Monthly54
Yearly648

Peugeot e-208

Cost per 100 km4.47
Monthly56
Yearly671

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Lancia Ypsilon

Peugeot e-208

Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment B

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Peugeot e-208 — its 51 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Lancia Ypsilon, with 51 kWh, does not offer it.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Lancia Ypsilon takes more: 309 l against 265 l in the Peugeot e-208. The difference is 44 l.

Which charges faster?

The Lancia Ypsilon accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Peugeot e-208 up to 100 kW.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Lancia Ypsilon uses less electricity: 14.4 kWh/100 km against 14.9 kWh/100 km in the Peugeot e-208. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 75 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.