Lancia Ypsilon vs Peugeot e-208
Biggest differences: AC charging — Lancia Ypsilon 7.4 kW, Peugeot e-208 11 kW · Boot — Lancia Ypsilon 309 l, Peugeot e-208 265 l · 0–100 km/h — Lancia Ypsilon 9 s, Peugeot e-208 8.2 s.
Lancia Ypsilon
The Lancia Ypsilon is a city hatchback in the B-segment, offered with two electric powertrain configurations offering different power outputs and performance characteristics.
Peugeot e-208
The Peugeot e-208 is a city hatchback in the B-segment, offered with three different powertrain options, each offering varying power outputs and battery capacities.
Profile against the market: Lancia Ypsilon vs Peugeot e-208
Lancia YpsilonElectric
Peugeot e-208GT 156
Lancia Ypsilon or Peugeot e-208 — who wins where
Peugeot e-208 leads 4 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmPeugeot e-208 +8 km
- Battery kWhNo difference
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmLancia Ypsilon −0.5 kWh/100 km
- Power PSNo difference
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sPeugeot e-208 −0.8 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWPeugeot e-208 +3.6 kW
- Weight ↓ kgPeugeot e-208 −106 kg
- Boot lLancia Ypsilon +44 l
Technical data: Lancia Ypsilon vs Peugeot e-208
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Lancia YpsilonElectric | GT 156 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 425 km | 433 km | Peugeot +8 km |
| Battery | 51 kWh | 51 kWh | No difference |
| Consumption ↓ | 14.4 kWh/100 km | 14.9 kWh/100 km | Lancia −0.5 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 100 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | 7.4 kW | 11 kW | Peugeot +3.6 kW |
| Charging ⚠ | 28 min 10–80% | 35 min 0–80% | 7 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 10.6 km/min | 9.9 km/min | Lancia +0.7 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 156 PS | 156 PS | No difference |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 9 s | 8.2 s | Peugeot −0.8 s |
| Top speed | 150 km/h | 150 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1561 kg | 1455 kg | Peugeot −106 kg |
| Boot | 309 l | 265 l | Lancia +44 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Peugeot |
| Length | 4080 mm | 4055 mm | Lancia +25 mm |
| Width | 1768 mm | 1745 mm | Lancia +23 mm |
| Height | 1440 mm | 1430 mm | Lancia +10 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2545 mm | 2540 mm | Lancia +5 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Lancia Ypsilon
Peugeot e-208
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Lancia Ypsilon
Peugeot e-208
Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment B
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Peugeot e-208 — its 51 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Lancia Ypsilon, with 51 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Lancia Ypsilon takes more: 309 l against 265 l in the Peugeot e-208. The difference is 44 l.
Which charges faster?
The Lancia Ypsilon accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Peugeot e-208 up to 100 kW.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Lancia Ypsilon uses less electricity: 14.4 kWh/100 km against 14.9 kWh/100 km in the Peugeot e-208. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 75 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.



