KGM Torres EVX vs Subaru Solterra
Biggest differences: DC charging — KGM Torres EVX 50 kW, Subaru Solterra 150 kW · Boot — KGM Torres EVX 839 l, Subaru Solterra 452 l · 0–100 km/h — KGM Torres EVX 8.11 s, Subaru Solterra 6.9 s.
KGM Torres EVX
The KGM Torres EVX is a compact SUV with front-wheel drive, offering a WLTP range of 462 km thanks to its 73.4 kWh battery.
Subaru Solterra
The Subaru Solterra is a compact SUV with AWD and a WLTP range of 466 km.
Profile against the market: KGM Torres EVX vs Subaru Solterra
KGM Torres EVXTorres EVX
Subaru SolterraAWD
KGM Torres EVX or Subaru Solterra — who wins where
Subaru Solterra leads 5 to 4
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmSubaru Solterra +4 km
- Battery kWhKGM Torres EVX +2 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmSubaru Solterra −2.3 kWh/100 km
- Power PSSubaru Solterra +11 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sSubaru Solterra −1.2 s
- Top speed km/hKGM Torres EVX +15 km/h
- DC charging kWSubaru Solterra +100 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgKGM Torres EVX −95 kg
- Boot lKGM Torres EVX +387 l
Technical data: KGM Torres EVX vs Subaru Solterra
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | KGM Torres EVX Torres EVX | Subaru Solterra AWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 462 km | 466 km | Subaru +4 km |
| Battery | 73.4 kWh | 71.4 kWh | KGM +2 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 17.7 kWh/100 km | 15.4 kWh/100 km | Subaru −2.3 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 50 kW | 150 kW | Subaru +100 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | — | 30 min | — |
| Range per minute of charging | — | 10.9 km/min | — |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 207 PS | 218 PS | Subaru +11 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 8.11 s | 6.9 s | Subaru −1.2 s |
| Top speed | 175 km/h | 160 km/h | KGM +15 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | AWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1915 kg | 2010 kg | KGM −95 kg |
| Boot | 839 l | 452 l | KGM +387 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only KGM |
| Length | 4715 mm | 4690 mm | KGM +25 mm |
| Width | 1890 mm | 1860 mm | KGM +30 mm |
| Height | 1725 mm | 1650 mm | KGM +75 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2680 mm | 2850 mm | Subaru +170 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
KGM Torres EVX
Subaru Solterra
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
KGM Torres EVX
Subaru Solterra
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Why does the KGM Torres EVX have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Subaru Solterra?
The KGM Torres EVX carries 73.4 kWh and covers 462 km, while the Subaru Solterra with its 71.4 kWh battery does 466 km. Energy use decides it: 17.7 against 15.4 kWh/100 km.
How do the drivetrains of the KGM Torres EVX and the Subaru Solterra differ?
The KGM Torres EVX has FWD and 207 PS. The Subaru Solterra has AWD and 218 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the KGM Torres EVX — its 73.4 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Subaru Solterra, with 71.4 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The KGM Torres EVX takes more: 839 l against 452 l in the Subaru Solterra. The difference is 387 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.