Jeep Avenger vs Leapmotor B03X
Biggest differences: Boot — Jeep Avenger 355 l, Leapmotor B03X 510 l · Charging 10–80% — Jeep Avenger 30 min, Leapmotor B03X 21 min · DC charging — Jeep Avenger 100 kW, Leapmotor B03X 133 kW.
Jeep Avenger
The Jeep Avenger is an all-electric SUV in the B segment, offering front-wheel drive and a range of up to 400 kilometers according to the WLTP cycle.
Leapmotor B03X
The Leapmotor B03X is a compact front-wheel drive SUV that offers two variants with different battery capacities and ranges.
Profile against the market: Jeep Avenger vs Leapmotor B03X
Jeep AvengerElectric
Leapmotor B03XDesign
Jeep Avenger or Leapmotor B03X — who wins where
Leapmotor B03X leads 7 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmJeep Avenger +18 km
- Battery kWhLeapmotor B03X +2 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmJeep Avenger −0.2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSLeapmotor B03X +41 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sLeapmotor B03X −1 s
- Top speed km/hLeapmotor B03X +10 km/h
- DC charging kWLeapmotor B03X +33 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minLeapmotor B03X −9 min
- Weight ↓ kgJeep Avenger −110 kg
- Boot lLeapmotor B03X +155 l
Technical data: Jeep Avenger vs Leapmotor B03X
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Jeep Avenger Electric | Leapmotor B03X Design | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 400 km | 382 km | Jeep +18 km |
| Battery | 51 kWh | 53 kWh | Leapmotor +2 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.5 kWh/100 km | 15.7 kWh/100 km | Jeep −0.2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 133 kW | Leapmotor +33 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 30 min | 21 min | Leapmotor −9 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 9.3 km/min | 12.7 km/min | Leapmotor +3.4 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 156 PS | 197 PS | Leapmotor +41 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 9 s | 8 s | Leapmotor −1 s |
| Top speed | 150 km/h | 160 km/h | Leapmotor +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1520 kg | 1630 kg | Jeep −110 kg |
| Boot | 355 l | 510 l | Leapmotor +155 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Leapmotor |
| Length | 4084 mm | 4270 mm | Leapmotor +186 mm |
| Width | 1776 mm | 1810 mm | Leapmotor +34 mm |
| Height | 1527 mm | 1640 mm | Leapmotor +113 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2562 mm | 2605 mm | Leapmotor +43 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Jeep Avenger
Leapmotor B03X
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Jeep Avenger
Leapmotor B03X
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment B
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Jeep Avenger or Leapmotor B03X?
The Jeep Avenger goes further: 400 km WLTP against the 382 km of the Leapmotor B03X. That is a difference of 18 km.
Why does the Leapmotor B03X have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Jeep Avenger?
The Leapmotor B03X carries 53 kWh and covers 382 km, while the Jeep Avenger with its 51 kWh battery does 400 km. Energy use decides it: 15.7 against 15.5 kWh/100 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Leapmotor B03X — its 53 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Jeep Avenger, with 51 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Leapmotor B03X takes more: 510 l against 355 l in the Jeep Avenger. The difference is 155 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.