Honda Super-N vs JAC E30X

Biggest differences: Boot — Honda Super-N 162 l, JAC E30X 310 l · Battery — Honda Super-N 28 kWh, JAC E30X 51.5 kWh · WLTP range — Honda Super-N 206 km, JAC E30X 374 km.

Honda Super-N

The Honda Super-N is a city hatchback in the B-segment, offering front-wheel drive and a range of up to 206 kilometers according to the WLTP cycle.

JAC E30X

The JAC E30X is an electric hatchback in the B-segment, offering two battery options and corresponding ranges, all with the same powertrain output.

Profile against the market: Honda Super-N vs JAC E30X

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Honda Super-N or JAC E30X — who wins where

JAC E30X leads 8 to 2

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmJAC E30X +168 km
    Honda Super-N
    206
    JAC E30X
    374
  • Battery kWhJAC E30X +23.5 kWh
    Honda Super-N
    28
    JAC E30X
    51.5
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmHonda Super-N −0.8 kWh/100 km
    Honda Super-N
    14.8
    JAC E30X
    15.6
  • Power PSJAC E30X +41 PS
    Honda Super-N
    95
    JAC E30X
    136
  • 0–100 km/h sJAC E30X −2.2 s
    Honda Super-N
    10
    JAC E30X
    7.8
  • Top speed km/hJAC E30X +16 km/h
    Honda Super-N
    134
    JAC E30X
    150
  • DC charging kWJAC E30X +14 kW
    Honda Super-N
    50
    JAC E30X
    64
  • AC charging kWJAC E30X +1 kW
    Honda Super-N
    10
    JAC E30X
    11
  • Weight kgHonda Super-N −348 kg
    Honda Super-N
    1097
    JAC E30X
    1445
  • Boot lJAC E30X +148 l
    Honda Super-N
    162
    JAC E30X
    310

Add a third car

Technical data: Honda Super-N vs JAC E30X

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Honda Super-N vs JAC E30X
Key parameters Honda Super-N
Advance
JAC E30X
Nordic Edition 50
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range206 km374 kmJAC +168 km
Battery28 kWh51.5 kWhJAC +23.5 kWh
Consumption14.8 kWh/100 km15.6 kWh/100 kmHonda −0.8 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging50 kW64 kWJAC +14 kW
AC charging10 kW11 kWJAC +1 kW
Charging 30 min 15–80%45 min 30–80%15 min
Range per minute of charging4.5 km/min4.2 km/minHonda +0.3 km/min
Voltage400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power95 PS136 PSJAC +41 PS
0–100 km/h10 s7.8 sJAC −2.2 s
Top speed134 km/h150 km/hJAC +16 km/h
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight1097 kg1445 kgHonda −348 kg
Boot162 l310 lJAC +148 l
Length3599 mm4025 mmJAC +426 mm
Width1573 mm1770 mmJAC +197 mm
Height1608 mm1560 mmHonda +48 mm
Wheelbase2516 mm2620 mmJAC +104 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Honda Super-N

Cost per 100 km4.44
Monthly56
Yearly666

JAC E30X

Cost per 100 km4.68
Monthly59
Yearly702

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Honda Super-N

JAC E30X

Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment B

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Honda Super-N or JAC E30X?

The JAC E30X goes further: 374 km WLTP against the 206 km of the Honda Super-N. That is a difference of 168 km.

Which is more powerful — Honda Super-N or JAC E30X?

The JAC E30X is stronger: 136 PS against the 95 PS of the Honda Super-N. The gap is 41 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The JAC E30X takes more: 310 l against 162 l in the Honda Super-N. The difference is 148 l.

Which charges faster?

The Honda Super-N accepts up to 50 kW DC, the JAC E30X up to 64 kW.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.