Honda Super-N vs Volkswagen ID. Polo
Biggest differences: Boot — Honda Super-N 162 l, Volkswagen ID. Polo 441 l · Power — Honda Super-N 95 PS, Volkswagen ID. Polo 211 PS · WLTP range — Honda Super-N 206 km, Volkswagen ID. Polo 454 km.
Honda Super-N
The Honda Super-N is a city hatchback in the B-segment, offering front-wheel drive and a range of up to 206 kilometers according to the WLTP cycle.
Volkswagen ID. Polo
The Volkswagen ID. Polo is an electric hatchback in the B-segment, offered with three powertrain configurations featuring different ranges and performance levels.
Profile against the market: Honda Super-N vs Volkswagen ID. Polo
Honda Super-NAdvance
Volkswagen ID. Polo52 kWh 155 kW
Honda Super-N or Volkswagen ID. Polo — who wins where
Volkswagen ID. Polo leads 9 to 1
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmVolkswagen ID. Polo +248 km
- Battery kWhVolkswagen ID. Polo +24 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmVolkswagen ID. Polo −1.5 kWh/100 km
- Power PSVolkswagen ID. Polo +116 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sVolkswagen ID. Polo −2.6 s
- Top speed km/hVolkswagen ID. Polo +26 km/h
- DC charging kWVolkswagen ID. Polo +55 kW
- AC charging kWVolkswagen ID. Polo +1 kW
- Weight ↓ kgHonda Super-N −479 kg
- Boot lVolkswagen ID. Polo +279 l
Technical data: Honda Super-N vs Volkswagen ID. Polo
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Honda Super-N Advance | Volkswagen ID. Polo 52 kWh 155 kW | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 206 km | 454 km | Volkswagen +248 km |
| Battery | 28 kWh | 52 kWh | Volkswagen +24 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 14.8 kWh/100 km | 13.3 kWh/100 km | Volkswagen −1.5 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 50 kW | 105 kW | Volkswagen +55 kW |
| AC charging | 10 kW | 11 kW | Volkswagen +1 kW |
| Charging ⚠ | 30 min 15–80% | 24 min 10–80% | 6 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 4.5 km/min | 13.2 km/min | Volkswagen +8.7 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 95 PS | 211 PS | Volkswagen +116 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 10 s | 7.4 s | Volkswagen −2.6 s |
| Top speed | 134 km/h | 160 km/h | Volkswagen +26 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1097 kg | 1576 kg | Honda −479 kg |
| Boot | 162 l | 441 l | Volkswagen +279 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Volkswagen |
| Length | 3599 mm | 4053 mm | Volkswagen +454 mm |
| Width | 1573 mm | 1816 mm | Volkswagen +243 mm |
| Height | 1608 mm | 1530 mm | Honda +78 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2516 mm | 2600 mm | Volkswagen +84 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Honda Super-N
Volkswagen ID. Polo
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Honda Super-N
Volkswagen ID. Polo
Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment B
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Honda Super-N or Volkswagen ID. Polo?
The Volkswagen ID. Polo goes further: 454 km WLTP against the 206 km of the Honda Super-N. That is a difference of 248 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Volkswagen ID. Polo — its 52 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Honda Super-N, with 28 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Honda Super-N or Volkswagen ID. Polo?
The Volkswagen ID. Polo is stronger: 211 PS against the 95 PS of the Honda Super-N. The gap is 116 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Volkswagen ID. Polo takes more: 441 l against 162 l in the Honda Super-N. The difference is 279 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.