Honda Super-N vs Nio Firefly
Biggest differences: Boot — Honda Super-N 162 l, Nio Firefly 404 l · DC charging — Honda Super-N 50 kW, Nio Firefly 100 kW · WLTP range — Honda Super-N 206 km, Nio Firefly 330 km.
Honda Super-N
The Honda Super-N is a city hatchback in the B-segment, offering front-wheel drive and a range of up to 206 kilometers according to the WLTP cycle.
Nio Firefly
The Nio Firefly is a compact hatchback with rear-wheel drive, offering a range of 330 km in the WLTP cycle.
Profile against the market: Honda Super-N vs Nio Firefly
Honda Super-NAdvance
Nio Firefly42.1 kWh RWD
Honda Super-N or Nio Firefly — who wins where
Nio Firefly leads 9 to 1
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmNio Firefly +124 km
- Battery kWhNio Firefly +14.1 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmNio Firefly −0.3 kWh/100 km
- Power PSNio Firefly +48 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sNio Firefly −1.9 s
- Top speed km/hNio Firefly +16 km/h
- DC charging kWNio Firefly +50 kW
- AC charging kWNio Firefly +1 kW
- Weight ↓ kgHonda Super-N −370 kg
- Boot lNio Firefly +242 l
Technical data: Honda Super-N vs Nio Firefly
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Honda Super-N Advance | Nio Firefly 42.1 kWh RWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 206 km | 330 km | Nio +124 km |
| Battery | 28 kWh | 42.1 kWh | Nio +14.1 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 14.8 kWh/100 km | 14.5 kWh/100 km | Nio −0.3 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 50 kW | 100 kW | Nio +50 kW |
| AC charging | 10 kW | 11 kW | Nio +1 kW |
| Charging ⚠ | 30 min 15–80% | 29 min 10–80% | 1 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 4.5 km/min | 8 km/min | Nio +3.5 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 95 PS | 143 PS | Nio +48 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 10 s | 8.1 s | Nio −1.9 s |
| Top speed | 134 km/h | 150 km/h | Nio +16 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1097 kg | 1467 kg | Honda −370 kg |
| Boot | 162 l | 404 l | Nio +242 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Nio |
| Length | 3599 mm | 4003 mm | Nio +404 mm |
| Width | 1573 mm | 1885 mm | Nio +312 mm |
| Height | 1608 mm | 1557 mm | Honda +51 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2516 mm | 2615 mm | Nio +99 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Honda Super-N
Nio Firefly
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Honda Super-N
Nio Firefly
Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment B
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Honda Super-N or Nio Firefly?
The Nio Firefly goes further: 330 km WLTP against the 206 km of the Honda Super-N. That is a difference of 124 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Honda Super-N and the Nio Firefly differ?
The Honda Super-N has FWD and 95 PS. The Nio Firefly has RWD and 143 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Nio Firefly — its 42.1 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Honda Super-N, with 28 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Honda Super-N or Nio Firefly?
The Nio Firefly is stronger: 143 PS against the 95 PS of the Honda Super-N. The gap is 48 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.