GAC Aion UT vs MG 4 Urban

Biggest differences: 0–100 km/h — GAC Aion UT 7.3 s, MG 4 Urban 9.5 s · Power — GAC Aion UT 204 PS, MG 4 Urban 160 PS · Battery — GAC Aion UT 60 kWh, MG 4 Urban 52.8 kWh.

GAC Aion UT

The GAC Aion UT is an electric hatchback in the C-segment, offering a range of 430 km according to the WLTP cycle and accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h in 7.3 seconds.

MG 4 Urban

MG 4 Urban is an electric C-segment hatchback, offering two powertrain variants with different battery capacities and power.

Profile against the market: GAC Aion UT vs MG 4 Urban

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

GAC Aion UT or MG 4 Urban — who wins where

It's a tie: 4 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmGAC Aion UT +14 km
    GAC Aion UT
    430
    MG 4 Urban
    416
  • Battery kWhGAC Aion UT +7.2 kWh
    GAC Aion UT
    60
    MG 4 Urban
    52.8
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmMG 4 Urban −1.1 kWh/100 km
    GAC Aion UT
    16.4
    MG 4 Urban
    15.3
  • Power PSGAC Aion UT +44 PS
    GAC Aion UT
    204
    MG 4 Urban
    160
  • 0–100 km/h sGAC Aion UT −2.2 s
    GAC Aion UT
    7.3
    MG 4 Urban
    9.5
  • Top speed km/hNo difference
    GAC Aion UT
    160
    MG 4 Urban
    160
  • DC charging kWNo difference
    GAC Aion UT
    87
    MG 4 Urban
    87
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    GAC Aion UT
    11
    MG 4 Urban
    11
  • Charging minMG 4 Urban −2 min
    GAC Aion UT
    32
    MG 4 Urban
    30
  • Weight kgMG 4 Urban −125 kg
    GAC Aion UT
    1645
    MG 4 Urban
    1520
  • Boot lMG 4 Urban +30 l
    GAC Aion UT
    440
    MG 4 Urban
    470

Add a third car

Technical data: GAC Aion UT vs MG 4 Urban

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: GAC Aion UT vs MG 4 Urban
Key parameters GAC Aion UT
60 kWh
MG 4 Urban
Comfort Long Range
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range430 km416 kmGAC +14 km
Battery60 kWh52.8 kWhGAC +7.2 kWh
Consumption16.4 kWh/100 km15.3 kWh/100 kmMG −1.1 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging87 kW87 kWNo difference
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%32 min30 minMG −2 min
Range per minute of charging9.4 km/min9.7 km/minMG +0.3 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power204 PS160 PSGAC +44 PS
0–100 km/h7.3 s9.5 sGAC −2.2 s
Top speed160 km/h160 km/hNo difference
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight1645 kg1520 kgMG −125 kg
Boot440 l470 lMG +30 l
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length4270 mm4395 mmMG +125 mm
Width1850 mm1842 mmGAC +8 mm
Height1575 mm1549 mmGAC +26 mm
Wheelbase2750 mm2750 mmNo difference

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

GAC Aion UT

Cost per 100 km4.92
Monthly61
Yearly738

MG 4 Urban

Cost per 100 km4.59
Monthly57
Yearly689

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

GAC Aion UT

MG 4 Urban

Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — GAC Aion UT or MG 4 Urban?

The GAC Aion UT goes further: 430 km WLTP against the 416 km of the MG 4 Urban. That is a difference of 14 km.

Which charges faster?

The GAC Aion UT accepts up to 87 kW DC, the MG 4 Urban up to 87 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 32 and 30 min respectively.

Which is cheaper to run?

The MG 4 Urban uses less electricity: 15.3 kWh/100 km against 16.4 kWh/100 km in the GAC Aion UT. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 165 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.