Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Volkswagen ID.4
Biggest differences: Boot — Ford Mustang Mach-E 402 l, Volkswagen ID.4 543 l · Charging 10–80% — Ford Mustang Mach-E 36 min, Volkswagen ID.4 28 min · DC charging — Ford Mustang Mach-E 150 kW, Volkswagen ID.4 175 kW.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is a D-segment SUV offering four different powertrain and battery configurations with WLTP ranges from 470 to 600 km.
Volkswagen ID.4
The Volkswagen ID.4 is an electric SUV in the D segment, offering three different drive configurations and battery capacities.
Profile against the market: Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Volkswagen ID.4
Ford Mustang Mach-EExtended Range RWD
Volkswagen ID.4Pro
Ford Mustang Mach-E or Volkswagen ID.4 — who wins where
Volkswagen ID.4 leads 5 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmFord Mustang Mach-E +28 km
- Battery kWhFord Mustang Mach-E +12 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmVolkswagen ID.4 −1.7 kWh/100 km
- Power PSFord Mustang Mach-E +8 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sFord Mustang Mach-E −0.5 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWVolkswagen ID.4 +25 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minVolkswagen ID.4 −8 min
- Weight ↓ kgVolkswagen ID.4 −69 kg
- Boot lVolkswagen ID.4 +141 l
Technical data: Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Volkswagen ID.4
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range RWD | Volkswagen ID.4 Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 600 km | 572 km | Ford +28 km |
| Battery | 91 kWh | 79 kWh | Ford +12 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 17.5 kWh/100 km | 15.8 kWh/100 km | Volkswagen −1.7 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 150 kW | 175 kW | Volkswagen +25 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 36 min | 28 min | Volkswagen −8 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 11.7 km/min | 14.3 km/min | Volkswagen +2.6 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 294 PS | 286 PS | Ford +8 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.2 s | 6.7 s | Ford −0.5 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 180 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2129 kg | 2060 kg | Volkswagen −69 kg |
| Boot | 402 l | 543 l | Volkswagen +141 l |
| Length | 4713 mm | 4584 mm | Ford +129 mm |
| Width | 1881 mm | 1852 mm | Ford +29 mm |
| Height | 1597 mm | 1640 mm | Volkswagen +43 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2984 mm | 2771 mm | Ford +213 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Volkswagen ID.4
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Volkswagen ID.4
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Ford Mustang Mach-E or Volkswagen ID.4?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E goes further: 600 km WLTP against the 572 km of the Volkswagen ID.4. That is a difference of 28 km.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Volkswagen ID.4 takes more: 543 l against 402 l in the Ford Mustang Mach-E. The difference is 141 l.
Which charges faster?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E accepts up to 150 kW DC, the Volkswagen ID.4 up to 175 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 36 and 28 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Volkswagen ID.4 uses less electricity: 15.8 kWh/100 km against 17.5 kWh/100 km in the Ford Mustang Mach-E. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 255 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.