DS N°4 vs GAC Aion UT
Biggest differences: DC charging — DS N°4 120 kW, GAC Aion UT 87 kW · Boot — DS N°4 390 l, GAC Aion UT 440 l · Weight — DS N°4 1792 kg, GAC Aion UT 1645 kg.
DS N°4
The DS N°4 is an electric hatchback in the C-segment, offering a WLTP range of 447 km and accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h in 7.1 seconds.
GAC Aion UT
The GAC Aion UT is an electric hatchback in the C-segment, offering a range of 430 km according to the WLTP cycle and accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h in 7.3 seconds.
Profile against the market: DS N°4 vs GAC Aion UT
- DS N°4E-Tense 213 KM
GAC Aion UT60 kWh
DS N°4 or GAC Aion UT — who wins where
DS N°4 leads 5 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmDS N°4 +17 km
- Battery kWhGAC Aion UT +1.7 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmDS N°4 −1.3 kWh/100 km
- Power PSDS N°4 +9 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sDS N°4 −0.2 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWDS N°4 +33 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgGAC Aion UT −147 kg
- Boot lGAC Aion UT +50 l
Technical data: DS N°4 vs GAC Aion UT
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | DS N°4 E-Tense 213 KM | GAC Aion UT 60 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 447 km | 430 km | DS +17 km |
| Battery | 58.3 kWh | 60 kWh | GAC +1.7 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.1 kWh/100 km | 16.4 kWh/100 km | DS −1.3 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 120 kW | 87 kW | DS +33 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 31 min 20–80% | 32 min 10–80% | 1 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 8.7 km/min | 9.4 km/min | GAC +0.7 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 213 PS | 204 PS | DS +9 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.1 s | 7.3 s | DS −0.2 s |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 160 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1792 kg | 1645 kg | GAC −147 kg |
| Boot | 390 l | 440 l | GAC +50 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4400 mm | 4270 mm | DS +130 mm |
| Width | 1870 mm | 1850 mm | DS +20 mm |
| Height | 1490 mm | 1575 mm | GAC +85 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2675 mm | 2750 mm | GAC +75 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
DS N°4
GAC Aion UT
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — DS N°4 or GAC Aion UT?
The DS N°4 goes further: 447 km WLTP against the 430 km of the GAC Aion UT. That is a difference of 17 km.
Why does the GAC Aion UT have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the DS N°4?
The GAC Aion UT carries 60 kWh and covers 430 km, while the DS N°4 with its 58.3 kWh battery does 447 km. Energy use decides it: 16.4 against 15.1 kWh/100 km.
Which has the bigger boot?
The GAC Aion UT takes more: 440 l against 390 l in the DS N°4. The difference is 50 l.
Which charges faster?
The DS N°4 accepts up to 120 kW DC, the GAC Aion UT up to 87 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.