BYD Tang vs Mercedes G 580

Biggest differences: Boot — BYD Tang 235 l, Mercedes G 580 555 l · Charging 10–80% — BYD Tang 46 min, Mercedes G 580 29 min · DC charging — BYD Tang 170 kW, Mercedes G 580 210 kW.

BYD Tang

An electric SUV in the E-segment, featuring a powerful engine.

Mercedes G 580

An all-electric SUV in the E segment, featuring a large battery capacity, fast DC charging capabilities, and all-wheel drive.

Profile against the market: BYD Tang vs Mercedes G 580

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BYD Tang or Mercedes G 580 — who wins where

Mercedes G 580 leads 6 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmBYD Tang +51 km
    BYD Tang
    530
    Mercedes G 580
    479
  • Battery kWhMercedes G 580 +8.2 kWh
    BYD Tang
    108.8
    Mercedes G 580
    117
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmBYD Tang −3.9 kWh/100 km
    BYD Tang
    24
    Mercedes G 580
    27.9
  • Power PSMercedes G 580 +70 PS
    BYD Tang
    517
    Mercedes G 580
    587
  • 0–100 km/h sMercedes G 580 −0.2 s
    BYD Tang
    4.9
    Mercedes G 580
    4.7
  • Top speed km/hBYD Tang +10 km/h
    BYD Tang
    190
    Mercedes G 580
    180
  • DC charging kWMercedes G 580 +40 kW
    BYD Tang
    170
    Mercedes G 580
    210
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    BYD Tang
    11
    Mercedes G 580
    11
  • Charging minMercedes G 580 −17 min
    BYD Tang
    46
    Mercedes G 580
    29
  • Weight kgBYD Tang −380 kg
    BYD Tang
    2630
    Mercedes G 580
    3010
  • Boot lMercedes G 580 +320 l
    BYD Tang
    235
    Mercedes G 580
    555

Add a third car

Technical data: BYD Tang vs Mercedes G 580

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BYD Tang vs Mercedes G 580
Key parameters BYD Tang
Flagship
Mercedes G 580
EQ
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range530 km479 kmBYD +51 km
Battery108.8 kWh117 kWhMercedes +8.2 kWh
Consumption24 kWh/100 km27.9 kWh/100 kmBYD −3.9 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging170 kW210 kWMercedes +40 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%46 min29 minMercedes −17 min
Range per minute of charging8.1 km/min11.6 km/minMercedes +3.5 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power517 PS587 PSMercedes +70 PS
0–100 km/h4.9 s4.7 sMercedes −0.2 s
Top speed190 km/h180 km/hBYD +10 km/h
DrivetrainAWDAWD
Practicality
Weight2630 kg3010 kgBYD −380 kg
Boot235 l555 lMercedes +320 l
V2L (external power)YesNoonly BYD
Length4970 mm4624 mmBYD +346 mm
Width1955 mm1931 mmBYD +24 mm
Height1745 mm1986 mmMercedes +241 mm
Wheelbase2820 mm2890 mmMercedes +70 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BYD Tang

Cost per 100 km7.2
Monthly90
Yearly1080

Mercedes G 580

Cost per 100 km8.37
Monthly105
Yearly1255

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BYD Tang

Mercedes G 580

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment E

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — BYD Tang or Mercedes G 580?

The BYD Tang goes further: 530 km WLTP against the 479 km of the Mercedes G 580. That is a difference of 51 km.

Why does the Mercedes G 580 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the BYD Tang?

The Mercedes G 580 carries 117 kWh and covers 479 km, while the BYD Tang with its 108.8 kWh battery does 530 km. Energy use decides it: 27.9 against 24 kWh/100 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the BYD Tang — its 108.8 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Mercedes G 580, with 117 kWh, does not offer it.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Mercedes G 580 takes more: 555 l against 235 l in the BYD Tang. The difference is 320 l.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.