BYD Seal U vs GAC Aion V

Biggest differences: DC charging — BYD Seal U 140 kW, GAC Aion V 180 kW · Boot — BYD Seal U 552 l, GAC Aion V 442 l · Consumption — BYD Seal U 20.5 kWh/100 km, GAC Aion V 16.7 kWh/100 km.

BYD Seal U

The BYD Seal U is an SUV in the D segment, offering two front-wheel drive variants with different battery capacities and WLTP ranges.

GAC Aion V

This electric SUV, belonging to the D-segment, offers a range of 510 kilometers in the WLTP cycle and boasts a power output of 204 horsepower.

Profile against the market: BYD Seal U vs GAC Aion V

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BYD Seal U or GAC Aion V — who wins where

GAC Aion V leads 6 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmGAC Aion V +10 km
    BYD Seal U
    500
    GAC Aion V
    510
  • Battery kWhBYD Seal U +11.7 kWh
    BYD Seal U
    87
    GAC Aion V
    75.3
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmGAC Aion V −3.8 kWh/100 km
    BYD Seal U
    20.5
    GAC Aion V
    16.7
  • Power PSBYD Seal U +13 PS
    BYD Seal U
    217
    GAC Aion V
    204
  • 0–100 km/h sGAC Aion V −1.6 s
    BYD Seal U
    9.6
    GAC Aion V
    8
  • Top speed km/hGAC Aion V +5 km/h
    BYD Seal U
    175
    GAC Aion V
    180
  • DC charging kWGAC Aion V +40 kW
    BYD Seal U
    140
    GAC Aion V
    180
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    BYD Seal U
    11
    GAC Aion V
    11
  • Weight kgGAC Aion V −337 kg
    BYD Seal U
    2147
    GAC Aion V
    1810
  • Boot lBYD Seal U +110 l
    BYD Seal U
    552
    GAC Aion V
    442

Add a third car

Technical data: BYD Seal U vs GAC Aion V

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BYD Seal U vs GAC Aion V
Key parameters BYD Seal U
Design 87 kWh
GAC Aion V
77 kWh
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range500 km510 kmGAC +10 km
Battery87 kWh75.3 kWhBYD +11.7 kWh
Consumption20.5 kWh/100 km16.7 kWh/100 kmGAC −3.8 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging140 kW180 kWGAC +40 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 28 min 30–80%24 min 10–80%4 min
Range per minute of charging8.9 km/min14.9 km/minGAC +6 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power217 PS204 PSBYD +13 PS
0–100 km/h9.6 s8 sGAC −1.6 s
Top speed175 km/h180 km/hGAC +5 km/h
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight2147 kg1810 kgGAC −337 kg
Boot552 l442 lBYD +110 l
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length4785 mm4605 mmBYD +180 mm
Width1890 mm1876 mmBYD +14 mm
Height1668 mm1699 mmGAC +31 mm
Wheelbase2765 mm2775 mmGAC +10 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BYD Seal U

Cost per 100 km6.15
Monthly77
Yearly922

GAC Aion V

Cost per 100 km5.01
Monthly63
Yearly752

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BYD Seal U

GAC Aion V

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Why does the BYD Seal U have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the GAC Aion V?

The BYD Seal U carries 87 kWh and covers 500 km, while the GAC Aion V with its 75.3 kWh battery does 510 km. Energy use decides it: 20.5 against 16.7 kWh/100 km.

Which has the bigger boot?

The BYD Seal U takes more: 552 l against 442 l in the GAC Aion V. The difference is 110 l.

Which charges faster?

The BYD Seal U accepts up to 140 kW DC, the GAC Aion V up to 180 kW.

Which is cheaper to run?

The GAC Aion V uses less electricity: 16.7 kWh/100 km against 20.5 kWh/100 km in the BYD Seal U. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 570 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.