BYD Han vs Mercedes EQE

Biggest differences: Power — BYD Han 517 PS, Mercedes EQE 292 PS · 0–100 km/h — BYD Han 3.9 s, Mercedes EQE 6.1 s · Charging 10–80% — BYD Han 48 min, Mercedes EQE 32 min.

BYD Han

A high-performance electric sedan in the E-segment, featuring all-wheel drive and a range of 521 km according to the WLTP cycle.

Mercedes EQE

The Mercedes EQE is an electric sedan in the E-segment, offering three drive variants with ranges of up to 693 km according to the WLTP standard.

Profile against the market: BYD Han vs Mercedes EQE

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BYD Han or Mercedes EQE — who wins where

Mercedes EQE leads 7 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmMercedes EQE +172 km
    BYD Han
    521
    Mercedes EQE
    693
  • Battery kWhMercedes EQE +10.6 kWh
    BYD Han
    85.4
    Mercedes EQE
    96
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmMercedes EQE −3.4 kWh/100 km
    BYD Han
    19.3
    Mercedes EQE
    15.9
  • Power PSBYD Han +225 PS
    BYD Han
    517
    Mercedes EQE
    292
  • 0–100 km/h sBYD Han −2.2 s
    BYD Han
    3.9
    Mercedes EQE
    6.1
  • Top speed km/hMercedes EQE +30 km/h
    BYD Han
    180
    Mercedes EQE
    210
  • DC charging kWMercedes EQE +50 kW
    BYD Han
    120
    Mercedes EQE
    170
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    BYD Han
    11
    Mercedes EQE
    11
  • Charging minMercedes EQE −16 min
    BYD Han
    48
    Mercedes EQE
    32
  • Weight kgBYD Han −140 kg
    BYD Han
    2200
    Mercedes EQE
    2340
  • Boot lMercedes EQE +20 l
    BYD Han
    410
    Mercedes EQE
    430

Add a third car

Technical data: BYD Han vs Mercedes EQE

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BYD Han vs Mercedes EQE
Key parameters BYD Han
AWD 85.4 kWh
Mercedes EQE
EQE 350+
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range521 km693 kmMercedes +172 km
Battery85.4 kWh96 kWhMercedes +10.6 kWh
Consumption19.3 kWh/100 km15.9 kWh/100 kmMercedes −3.4 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging120 kW170 kWMercedes +50 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%48 min32 minMercedes −16 min
Range per minute of charging7.6 km/min15.2 km/minMercedes +7.6 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power517 PS292 PSBYD +225 PS
0–100 km/h3.9 s6.1 sBYD −2.2 s
Top speed180 km/h210 km/hMercedes +30 km/h
DrivetrainAWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight2200 kg2340 kgBYD −140 kg
Boot410 l430 lMercedes +20 l
V2L (external power)YesNoonly BYD
Length4995 mm4946 mmBYD +49 mm
Width1910 mm1961 mmMercedes +51 mm
Height1495 mm1510 mmMercedes +15 mm
Wheelbase2920 mm3120 mmMercedes +200 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BYD Han

Cost per 100 km5.79
Monthly72
Yearly869

Mercedes EQE

Cost per 100 km4.77
Monthly60
Yearly716

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BYD Han

Mercedes EQE

Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment E

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — BYD Han or Mercedes EQE?

The Mercedes EQE goes further: 693 km WLTP against the 521 km of the BYD Han. That is a difference of 172 km.

How do the drivetrains of the BYD Han and the Mercedes EQE differ?

The BYD Han has AWD and 517 PS. The Mercedes EQE has RWD and 292 PS.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the BYD Han — its 85.4 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Mercedes EQE, with 96 kWh, does not offer it.

Which is more powerful — BYD Han or Mercedes EQE?

The BYD Han is stronger: 517 PS against the 292 PS of the Mercedes EQE. The gap is 225 PS.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.