Mercedes EQE vs Volvo ES90
Biggest differences: Power — Mercedes EQE 292 PS, Volvo ES90 680 PS · DC charging — Mercedes EQE 170 kW, Volvo ES90 350 kW · 0–100 km/h — Mercedes EQE 6.1 s, Volvo ES90 4 s.
Mercedes EQE
The Mercedes EQE is an electric sedan in the E-segment, offering three drive variants with ranges of up to 693 km according to the WLTP standard.
Volvo ES90
The Volvo ES90 is an electric sedan in the E-segment, offering three powertrain variants with WLTP ranges of up to 702 km.
Profile against the market: Mercedes EQE vs Volvo ES90
Mercedes EQEEQE 350+
Volvo ES90Twin Motor Performance
Mercedes EQE or Volvo ES90 — who wins where
Volvo ES90 leads 7 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmVolvo ES90 +9 km
- Battery kWhVolvo ES90 +10 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmMercedes EQE −0.8 kWh/100 km
- Power PSVolvo ES90 +388 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sVolvo ES90 −2.1 s
- Top speed km/hMercedes EQE +30 km/h
- DC charging kWVolvo ES90 +180 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minVolvo ES90 −10 min
- Weight ↓ kgMercedes EQE −195 kg
- Boot lVolvo ES90 +12 l
Technical data: Mercedes EQE vs Volvo ES90
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Mercedes EQE EQE 350+ | Volvo ES90 Twin Motor Performance | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 693 km | 702 km | Volvo +9 km |
| Battery | 96 kWh | 106 kWh | Volvo +10 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.9 kWh/100 km | 16.7 kWh/100 km | Mercedes −0.8 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 170 kW | 350 kW | Volvo +180 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 32 min | 22 min | Volvo −10 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 15.2 km/min | 22.3 km/min | Volvo +7.1 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 800 V | Volvo +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 292 PS | 680 PS | Volvo +388 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.1 s | 4 s | Volvo −2.1 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 180 km/h | Mercedes +30 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2340 kg | 2535 kg | Mercedes −195 kg |
| Boot | 430 l | 442 l | Volvo +12 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Volvo |
| Length | 4946 mm | 5000 mm | Volvo +54 mm |
| Width | 1961 mm | 1942 mm | Mercedes +19 mm |
| Height | 1510 mm | 1549 mm | Volvo +39 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3120 mm | 3102 mm | Mercedes +18 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Mercedes EQE
Volvo ES90
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Mercedes EQE
Volvo ES90
Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment E
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
How do the drivetrains of the Mercedes EQE and the Volvo ES90 differ?
The Mercedes EQE has RWD and 292 PS. The Volvo ES90 has AWD and 680 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Volvo ES90 — its 106 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Mercedes EQE, with 96 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Mercedes EQE or Volvo ES90?
The Volvo ES90 is stronger: 680 PS against the 292 PS of the Mercedes EQE. The gap is 388 PS.
Which charges faster?
The Mercedes EQE accepts up to 170 kW DC, the Volvo ES90 up to 350 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 32 and 22 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.