DS N°8 vs Volvo ES90

DS N°8 leads 5 to 4

Biggest differences: Power — DS N°8 245 PS, Volvo ES90 680 PS · DC charging — DS N°8 160 kW, Volvo ES90 350 kW · 0–100 km/h — DS N°8 7.7 s, Volvo ES90 4 s.

DS N°8

The DS N°8 is an electric sedan in the E-segment, offering three drive variants with WLTP ranges from 550 km to 750 km.

Volvo ES90

The Volvo ES90 is an electric sedan in the E-segment, offering three powertrain variants with WLTP ranges of up to 702 km.

Profile against the market: DS N°8 vs Volvo ES90

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

DS N°8 or Volvo ES90 — who wins where

DS N°8 leads 5 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmDS N°8 +48 km
    DS N°8
    750
    Volvo ES90
    702
  • Battery kWhVolvo ES90 +8.8 kWh
    DS N°8
    97.2
    Volvo ES90
    106
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmDS N°8 −0.8 kWh/100 km
    DS N°8
    15.9
    Volvo ES90
    16.7
  • Power PSVolvo ES90 +435 PS
    DS N°8
    245
    Volvo ES90
    680
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sVolvo ES90 −3.7 s
    DS N°8
    7.7
    Volvo ES90
    4
  • Top speed km/hDS N°8 +10 km/h
    DS N°8
    190
    Volvo ES90
    180
  • DC charging kWVolvo ES90 +190 kW
    DS N°8
    160
    Volvo ES90
    350
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    DS N°8
    11
    Volvo ES90
    11
  • Weight ↓ kgDS N°8 −355 kg
    DS N°8
    2180
    Volvo ES90
    2535
  • Boot lDS N°8 +178 l
    DS N°8
    620
    Volvo ES90
    442

Add a third car

Technical data: DS N°8 vs Volvo ES90

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: DS N°8 vs Volvo ES90
Key parameters DS N°8
Long Range
Volvo ES90
Twin Motor Performance
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range750 km702 kmDS +48 km
Battery97.2 kWh106 kWhVolvo +8.8 kWh
Consumption ↓15.9 kWh/100 km16.7 kWh/100 kmDS −0.8 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging160 kW350 kWVolvo +190 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging ⚠27 min 20–80%22 min 10–80%5 min
Range per minute of charging16.7 km/min22.3 km/minVolvo +5.6 km/min
Voltage400 V800 VVolvo +400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power245 PS680 PSVolvo +435 PS
0–100 km/h ↓7.7 s4 sVolvo −3.7 s
Top speed190 km/h180 km/hDS +10 km/h
DrivetrainFWDAWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight ↓2180 kg2535 kgDS −355 kg
Boot620 l442 lDS +178 l
V2L (external power)YesYes—
Length4820 mm5000 mmVolvo +180 mm
Width1900 mm1942 mmVolvo +42 mm
Height1580 mm1549 mmDS +31 mm
Wheelbase2900 mm3102 mmVolvo +202 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

DS N°8

Cost per 100 km4.77
Monthly60
Yearly716

Volvo ES90

Cost per 100 km5.01
Monthly63
Yearly752

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

DS N°8

Volvo ES90

Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment E

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — DS N°8 or Volvo ES90?

The DS N°8 goes further: 750 km WLTP against the 702 km of the Volvo ES90. That is a difference of 48 km.

Why does the Volvo ES90 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the DS N°8?

The Volvo ES90 carries 106 kWh and covers 702 km, while the DS N°8 with its 97.2 kWh battery does 750 km. Energy use decides it: 16.7 against 15.9 kWh/100 km.

How do the drivetrains of the DS N°8 and the Volvo ES90 differ?

The DS N°8 has FWD and 245 PS. The Volvo ES90 has AWD and 680 PS.

Which is more powerful — DS N°8 or Volvo ES90?

The Volvo ES90 is stronger: 680 PS against the 245 PS of the DS N°8. The gap is 435 PS.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.