BMW iX vs BMW iX5

BMW iX5 leads 9 to 1

Biggest differences: DC charging — BMW iX 195 kW, BMW iX5 460 kW · AC charging — BMW iX 11 kW, BMW iX5 22 kW · Charging 10–80% — BMW iX 35 min, BMW iX5 23 min.

BMW iX

An all-electric SUV in the E segment, offering all-wheel drive and a WLTP range of up to 701 kilometers.

BMW iX5

The BMW iX5 is an all-electric SUV in the E segment with all-wheel drive (AWD): it offers 578 horsepower, a range of up to 845 km according to the WLTP standard, and supports DC fast charging up to 460 kW.

Profile against the market: BMW iX vs BMW iX5

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BMW iX or BMW iX5 — who wins where

BMW iX5 leads 9 to 1

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmBMW iX5 +144 km
    BMW iX
    701
    BMW iX5
    845
  • Battery kWhBMW iX5 +31.9 kWh
    BMW iX
    109.1
    BMW iX5
    141
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmBMW iX5 −1.8 kWh/100 km
    BMW iX
    21.9
    BMW iX5
    20.1
  • Power PSBMW iX5 +34 PS
    BMW iX
    544
    BMW iX5
    578
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sNo difference
    BMW iX
    4.6
    BMW iX5
    4.6
  • Top speed km/hBMW iX5 +10 km/h
    BMW iX
    200
    BMW iX5
    210
  • DC charging kWBMW iX5 +265 kW
    BMW iX
    195
    BMW iX5
    460
  • AC charging kWBMW iX5 +11 kW
    BMW iX
    11
    BMW iX5
    22
  • Charging ↓ minBMW iX5 −12 min
    BMW iX
    35
    BMW iX5
    23
  • Weight ↓ kgBMW iX −320 kg
    BMW iX
    2505
    BMW iX5
    2825
  • Boot lBMW iX5 +155 l
    BMW iX
    500
    BMW iX5
    655

Add a third car

Technical data: BMW iX vs BMW iX5

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BMW iX vs BMW iX5
Key parameters BMW iX
xDrive60
BMW iX5
60 xDrive
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range701 km845 kmBMW +144 km
Battery109.1 kWh141 kWhBMW +31.9 kWh
Consumption ↓21.9 kWh/100 km20.1 kWh/100 kmBMW −1.8 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging195 kW460 kWBMW +265 kW
AC charging11 kW22 kWBMW +11 kW
Charging 10–80% ↓35 min23 minBMW −12 min
Range per minute of charging14 km/min25.7 km/minBMW +11.7 km/min
Voltage400 V800 VBMW +400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power544 PS578 PSBMW +34 PS
0–100 km/h ↓4.6 s4.6 sNo difference
Top speed200 km/h210 km/hBMW +10 km/h
DrivetrainAWDAWD—
Practicality
Weight ↓2505 kg2825 kgBMW −320 kg
Boot500 l655 lBMW +155 l
Length4965 mm4994 mmBMW +29 mm
Width1970 mm2000 mmBMW +30 mm
Height1695 mm1748 mmBMW +53 mm
Wheelbase3000 mm3035 mmBMW +35 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BMW iX

Cost per 100 km6.57
Monthly82
Yearly985

BMW iX5

Cost per 100 km6.03
Monthly75
Yearly905

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BMW iX

BMW iX5

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment E

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — BMW iX or BMW iX5?

The BMW iX5 goes further: 845 km WLTP against the 701 km of the BMW iX. That is a difference of 144 km.

Which has the bigger boot?

The BMW iX5 takes more: 655 l against 500 l in the BMW iX. The difference is 155 l.

Which charges faster?

The BMW iX accepts up to 195 kW DC, the BMW iX5 up to 460 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 35 and 23 min respectively.

Which is cheaper to run?

The BMW iX5 uses less electricity: 20.1 kWh/100 km against 21.9 kWh/100 km in the BMW iX. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 270 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.