BMW i5 vs Xpeng P7+

Biggest differences: Charging 10–80% — BMW i5 30 min, Xpeng P7+ 12 min · DC charging — BMW i5 205 kW, Xpeng P7+ 446 kW · WLTP range — BMW i5 627 km, Xpeng P7+ 530 km.

BMW i5

The BMW i5 is an all-electric sedan in the E-segment, offering three powertrain options with power ranging from 340 horsepower to 601 horsepower.

Xpeng P7+

An electric sedan in the E-segment, offering three drive variants with WLTP ranges of up to 530 km and fast charging (DC).

Profile against the market: BMW i5 vs Xpeng P7+

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BMW i5 or Xpeng P7+ — who wins where

It's a tie: 5 to 5

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmBMW i5 +97 km
    BMW i5
    627
    Xpeng P7+
    530
  • Battery kWhBMW i5 +6.3 kWh
    BMW i5
    81.2
    Xpeng P7+
    74.9
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmBMW i5 −1.7 kWh/100 km
    BMW i5
    14.7
    Xpeng P7+
    16.4
  • Power PSBMW i5 +27 PS
    BMW i5
    340
    Xpeng P7+
    313
  • 0–100 km/h sBMW i5 −0.2 s
    BMW i5
    6
    Xpeng P7+
    6.2
  • Top speed km/hXpeng P7+ +7 km/h
    BMW i5
    193
    Xpeng P7+
    200
  • DC charging kWXpeng P7+ +241 kW
    BMW i5
    205
    Xpeng P7+
    446
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    BMW i5
    11
    Xpeng P7+
    11
  • Charging minXpeng P7+ −18 min
    BMW i5
    30
    Xpeng P7+
    12
  • Weight kgXpeng P7+ −35 kg
    BMW i5
    2135
    Xpeng P7+
    2100
  • Boot lXpeng P7+ +83 l
    BMW i5
    490
    Xpeng P7+
    573

Add a third car

Technical data: BMW i5 vs Xpeng P7+

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BMW i5 vs Xpeng P7+
Key parameters BMW i5
eDrive40
Xpeng P7+
Long Range RWD
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range627 km530 kmBMW +97 km
Battery81.2 kWh74.9 kWhBMW +6.3 kWh
Consumption14.7 kWh/100 km16.4 kWh/100 kmBMW −1.7 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging205 kW446 kWXpeng +241 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%30 min12 minXpeng −18 min
Range per minute of charging14.6 km/min30.9 km/minXpeng +16.3 km/min
Voltage400 V800 VXpeng +400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power340 PS313 PSBMW +27 PS
0–100 km/h6 s6.2 sBMW −0.2 s
Top speed193 km/h200 km/hXpeng +7 km/h
DrivetrainRWDRWD
Practicality
Weight2135 kg2100 kgXpeng −35 kg
Boot490 l573 lXpeng +83 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Xpeng
Length5060 mm5071 mmXpeng +11 mm
Width1900 mm1937 mmXpeng +37 mm
Height1515 mm1512 mmBMW +3 mm
Wheelbase2995 mm3000 mmXpeng +5 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BMW i5

Cost per 100 km4.41
Monthly55
Yearly661

Xpeng P7+

Cost per 100 km4.92
Monthly61
Yearly738

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BMW i5

Xpeng P7+

Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment E

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — BMW i5 or Xpeng P7+?

The BMW i5 goes further: 627 km WLTP against the 530 km of the Xpeng P7+. That is a difference of 97 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Xpeng P7+ — its 74.9 kWh battery then works as a power source. The BMW i5, with 81.2 kWh, does not offer it.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Xpeng P7+ takes more: 573 l against 490 l in the BMW i5. The difference is 83 l.

Which charges faster?

The BMW i5 accepts up to 205 kW DC, the Xpeng P7+ up to 446 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 30 and 12 min respectively.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.