Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Zeekr 7X
Biggest differences: AC charging — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 11 kW, Zeekr 7X 22 kW · DC charging — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 270 kW, Zeekr 7X 420 kW · Power — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 306 PS, Zeekr 7X 421 PS.
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron is a D-segment crossover offering four powertrain variants with power ranging from 252 hp to 489 hp.
Zeekr 7X
This electric SUV, belonging to the D-segment, offers three different powertrain options with power ranging from 421 horsepower to 646 horsepower, and features fast DC charging capabilities.
Profile against the market: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Zeekr 7X
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tronQ6 Sportback e-tron performance
Zeekr 7XLong Range RWD
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or Zeekr 7X — who wins where
Zeekr 7X leads 7 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +64 km
- Battery kWhZeekr 7X +5.1 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −2.4 kWh/100 km
- Power PSZeekr 7X +115 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sZeekr 7X −0.6 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWZeekr 7X +150 kW
- AC charging kWZeekr 7X +11 kW
- Charging ↓ minZeekr 7X −6 min
- Weight ↓ kgAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −215 kg
- Boot lZeekr 7X +28 l
Technical data: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Zeekr 7X
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron Q6 Sportback e-tron performance | Zeekr 7X Long Range RWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 679 km | 615 km | Audi +64 km |
| Battery | 94.9 kWh | 100 kWh | Zeekr +5.1 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.3 kWh/100 km | 17.7 kWh/100 km | Audi −2.4 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 270 kW | 420 kW | Zeekr +150 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 22 kW | Zeekr +11 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 22 min | 16 min | Zeekr −6 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 21.6 km/min | 26.9 km/min | Zeekr +5.3 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 800 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 306 PS | 421 PS | Zeekr +115 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 6 s | Zeekr −0.6 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 210 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2200 kg | 2415 kg | Audi −215 kg |
| Boot | 511 l | 539 l | Zeekr +28 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Zeekr |
| Length | 4771 mm | 4787 mm | Zeekr +16 mm |
| Width | 1939 mm | 1930 mm | Audi +9 mm |
| Height | 1611 mm | 1650 mm | Zeekr +39 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2893 mm | 2900 mm | Zeekr +7 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Zeekr 7X
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or Zeekr 7X?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron goes further: 679 km WLTP against the 615 km of the Zeekr 7X. That is a difference of 64 km.
Why does the Zeekr 7X have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron?
The Zeekr 7X carries 100 kWh and covers 615 km, while the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron with its 94.9 kWh battery does 679 km. Energy use decides it: 17.7 against 15.3 kWh/100 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Zeekr 7X — its 100 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron, with 94.9 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or Zeekr 7X?
The Zeekr 7X is stronger: 421 PS against the 306 PS of the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron. The gap is 115 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.