Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Toyota bZ4X
Biggest differences: DC charging — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 270 kW, Toyota bZ4X 150 kW · Battery — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 94.9 kWh, Toyota bZ4X 69 kWh · Power — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 306 PS, Toyota bZ4X 224 PS.
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron is a D-segment crossover offering four powertrain variants with power ranging from 252 hp to 489 hp.
Toyota bZ4X
The Toyota bZ4X is a compact SUV (segment D) that offers both front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive options, as well as battery packs with varying capacities.
Profile against the market: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Toyota bZ4X
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tronQ6 Sportback e-tron performance
Toyota bZ4XFWD 73.1 kWh
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or Toyota bZ4X — who wins where
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron leads 8 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +110 km
- Battery kWhAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +25.9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmToyota bZ4X −1.4 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +82 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −0.8 s
- Top speed km/hAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +50 km/h
- DC charging kWAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +120 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −6 min
- Weight ↓ kgToyota bZ4X −270 kg
- Boot lAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +59 l
Technical data: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Toyota bZ4X
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron Q6 Sportback e-tron performance | Toyota bZ4X FWD 73.1 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 679 km | 569 km | Audi +110 km |
| Battery | 94.9 kWh | 69 kWh | Audi +25.9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.3 kWh/100 km | 13.9 kWh/100 km | Toyota −1.4 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 270 kW | 150 kW | Audi +120 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 22 min | 28 min | Audi −6 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 21.6 km/min | 14.2 km/min | Audi +7.4 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 400 V | Audi +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 306 PS | 224 PS | Audi +82 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 7.4 s | Audi −0.8 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 160 km/h | Audi +50 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2200 kg | 1930 kg | Toyota −270 kg |
| Boot | 511 l | 452 l | Audi +59 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Toyota |
| Length | 4771 mm | 4690 mm | Audi +81 mm |
| Width | 1939 mm | 1860 mm | Audi +79 mm |
| Height | 1611 mm | 1650 mm | Toyota +39 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2893 mm | 2850 mm | Audi +43 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Toyota bZ4X
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Toyota bZ4X
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or Toyota bZ4X?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron goes further: 679 km WLTP against the 569 km of the Toyota bZ4X. That is a difference of 110 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron and the Toyota bZ4X differ?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron has RWD and 306 PS. The Toyota bZ4X has FWD and 224 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Toyota bZ4X — its 69 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron, with 94.9 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or Toyota bZ4X?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron is stronger: 306 PS against the 224 PS of the Toyota bZ4X. The gap is 82 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.