Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Smart #5
Biggest differences: AC charging — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 11 kW, Smart #5 22 kW · DC charging — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 270 kW, Smart #5 400 kW · Boot — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 511 l, Smart #5 630 l.
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron is a D-segment crossover offering four powertrain variants with power ranging from 252 hp to 489 hp.
Smart #5
Smart #5 is a D-segment SUV offering four drivetrain variants with power ranging from 340 hp to 646 hp.
Profile against the market: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Smart #5
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tronQ6 Sportback e-tron performance
Smart #5Pro+
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or Smart #5 — who wins where
Smart #5 leads 6 to 5
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +89 km
- Battery kWhAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +0.9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −3.1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSSmart #5 +57 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sSmart #5 −0.1 s
- Top speed km/hAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +10 km/h
- DC charging kWSmart #5 +130 kW
- AC charging kWSmart #5 +11 kW
- Charging ↓ minSmart #5 −4 min
- Weight ↓ kgAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −60 kg
- Boot lSmart #5 +119 l
Technical data: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Smart #5
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron Q6 Sportback e-tron performance | Smart #5 Pro+ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 679 km | 590 km | Audi +89 km |
| Battery | 94.9 kWh | 94 kWh | Audi +0.9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.3 kWh/100 km | 18.4 kWh/100 km | Audi −3.1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 270 kW | 400 kW | Smart +130 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 22 kW | Smart +11 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 22 min | 18 min | Smart −4 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 21.6 km/min | 22.9 km/min | Smart +1.3 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 800 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 306 PS | 363 PS | Smart +57 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 6.5 s | Smart −0.1 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 200 km/h | Audi +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2200 kg | 2260 kg | Audi −60 kg |
| Boot | 511 l | 630 l | Smart +119 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Smart |
| Length | 4771 mm | 4695 mm | Audi +76 mm |
| Width | 1939 mm | 1920 mm | Audi +19 mm |
| Height | 1611 mm | 1705 mm | Smart +94 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2893 mm | 2900 mm | Smart +7 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Smart #5
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Smart #5
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or Smart #5?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron goes further: 679 km WLTP against the 590 km of the Smart #5. That is a difference of 89 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Smart #5 — its 94 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron, with 94.9 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Smart #5 takes more: 630 l against 511 l in the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron. The difference is 119 l.
Which charges faster?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron accepts up to 270 kW DC, the Smart #5 up to 400 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 22 and 18 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.