Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Škoda Peaq
Biggest differences: Boot — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 511 l, Škoda Peaq 935 l · DC charging — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 270 kW, Škoda Peaq 199 kW · Charging 10–80% — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 22 min, Škoda Peaq 28 min.
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron is a D-segment crossover offering four powertrain variants with power ranging from 252 hp to 489 hp.
Škoda Peaq
The Škoda Peaq is an electric SUV in the D segment, offering three drive variants with ranges reaching up to 647 km according to the WLTP standard.
Profile against the market: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Škoda Peaq
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tronQ6 Sportback e-tron performance
Škoda Peaq90
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or Škoda Peaq — who wins where
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron leads 8 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +32 km
- Battery kWhAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +8.9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmŠkoda Peaq −0.3 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +20 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −0.5 s
- Top speed km/hAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +30 km/h
- DC charging kWAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +71 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −6 min
- Weight ↓ kgAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −34 kg
- Boot lŠkoda Peaq +424 l
Technical data: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Škoda Peaq
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron Q6 Sportback e-tron performance | Škoda Peaq 90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 679 km | 647 km | Audi +32 km |
| Battery | 94.9 kWh | 86 kWh | Audi +8.9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.3 kWh/100 km | 15 kWh/100 km | Škoda −0.3 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 270 kW | 199 kW | Audi +71 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 22 min | 28 min | Audi −6 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 21.6 km/min | 16.2 km/min | Audi +5.4 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 400 V | Audi +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 306 PS | 286 PS | Audi +20 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 7.1 s | Audi −0.5 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 180 km/h | Audi +30 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2200 kg | 2234 kg | Audi −34 kg |
| Boot | 511 l | 935 l | Škoda +424 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Škoda |
| Length | 4771 mm | 4874 mm | Škoda +103 mm |
| Width | 1939 mm | 1867 mm | Audi +72 mm |
| Height | 1611 mm | 1664 mm | Škoda +53 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2893 mm | 2965 mm | Škoda +72 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Škoda Peaq
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Škoda Peaq
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or Škoda Peaq?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron goes further: 679 km WLTP against the 647 km of the Škoda Peaq. That is a difference of 32 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Škoda Peaq — its 86 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron, with 94.9 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Škoda Peaq takes more: 935 l against 511 l in the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron. The difference is 424 l.
Which charges faster?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron accepts up to 270 kW DC, the Škoda Peaq up to 199 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 22 and 28 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.